Golfing on the Moon: Can a Ball Achieve Orbit?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jean-Louis
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ball Moon Orbit
AI Thread Summary
Hitting a golf ball on the moon to achieve a stable orbit is theoretically possible but requires calculating the necessary exit velocity to overcome lunar gravity. The trajectory of the ball would likely return to the original spot, especially if teed off from a high elevation. Despite the moon's lower gravity, the gravitational force is still significant enough that the ball would not maintain a true orbit. The comparison to launching a ball from Beijing to Tokyo illustrates the challenge of achieving the required distance. Ultimately, while the concept is intriguing, practical execution remains highly improbable.
Jean-Louis
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Imagine that you are on the surface of the moon, playing golf.

So, is it possible to hit a golf ball on the surface of the moon and have it achieve a stable orbit around the moon?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You would need to work out the exit velocity required by an object to leave the gravitation force. Then if this is humanly possible.

If so you could
 
The closest you could get to orbit would have a trajectory that would bring it back to where you started. So if you tee'd it up on a mountain, maybe, but otherwise it'd just hit you in the back of the head when it came around again.
 
remember, even though the moon has light gravity, its not as small as you think it is

even with light gravity, it would be like launching the ball from bejing to tokyo
 

Thread 'Is calling fictitious forces not real just about terminology?'

Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
View full post »

Thread 'Derivation of Hamilton's Principle: Questions'

I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
View full post »

Similar threads

I Rolling balls with different rotational inertia
Replies
14
Views
2K
A Puzzle Involving the Moon's Orbital Motion
Replies
19
Views
2K
Golf ball and Tennis ball turbulence
Replies
7
Views
4K
Orbital mechanics: is ballistic capture possible without acceleration?
Replies
7
Views
1K
Moment of impact in sports, what's really going on?
Replies
4
Views
2K
Testing Newtonian Gravity: Collision of Two Masses
Replies
17
Views
2K
How do I calculate the speed of the Earth around the Barycentre with the Moon?
Replies
17
Views
9K
Throwing a ball out of the end of a moving train
Replies
3
Views
3K
Would a Very Large Mass (e.g. the Moon) Fall with g?
Replies
11
Views
2K
B The Sun's Influence on the Moon's Orbit: Is it Negligible?
Replies
4
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top