Good book for vector/multivariable calculus

  • Thread starter Thread starter gangsta316
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Book Calculus
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around recommendations for the best books on multivariable calculus, particularly for second-year undergraduate mathematics students. Key topics include essential concepts such as differentiation of functions from Rn to Rm, optimization techniques like Lagrange multipliers, calculus of variations, and integrals in Rn, including line and surface integrals, as well as the divergence and Green's theorems. Participants emphasize that the best book varies by individual learning style, suggesting titles like Courant and John, Spivak's "Calculus on Manifolds," Apostol's volumes, and works by Williamson, Crowell, Fox, and Fleming. Older texts by Widder, Buck, and Edwards are also noted for their traditional approaches. Advanced readers might consider Dieudonné's "Foundations of Modern Analysis" or Loomis and Sternberg for deeper insights. The discussion highlights the importance of personal engagement in selecting a suitable textbook for mastering complex calculus concepts.
gangsta316
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
What's the best book for multivariable calculus? I'm a second year undergraduate student in Mathematics. Here is the content:

Functions from Rn to Rm: differentiation, contractions, Newton’s method, inverse function
theorem, implicit function theorem, higher derivatives.
Optimisation: extrema, constraints, Lagrange multipliers.
Calculus of variations: Euler-Lagrange, simple applications.
Integrals in Rn: curves, line integrals, Green’s theorem, transformation of integrals.
Vector calculus: vector fields, grad, div, curl, surface integrals, divergence theorem, Stokes’s
theorem, curvilinear coordinates.
Partial differential equations(simple wave, Laplace, heat).
Cartesian tensors: simple properties and notation, invariance.


At the moment I am having some difficulty with the integration (line integrals, surface integrals, divergence theorem, Green's theorem etc.).

Thanks for any help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
there is no best book. a book is good for you if you can learn from it, so you must participate in deciding which is best for you. I suggest courant, or courant and john, vol. 2, or spivak calculus on manifolds, or apostol vol. 2, or apostol mathematical analysis, or williamson crowell and fox, or fleming, or theodore shifrin's book. there are also many older books that are excellent if more traditional such as by widder, buck, or henry edwards. at a very advanced level there is the book by dieudonne, foundations of modern analysis. oh yes, and some students will benefit from loomis and sternberg, but only those who already know the material well. there are also books by lang, such as analysis I.
 
Last edited:
For the following four books, has anyone used them in a course or for self study? Compiler Construction Principles and Practice 1st Edition by Kenneth C Louden Programming Languages Principles and Practices 3rd Edition by Kenneth C Louden, and Kenneth A Lambert Programming Languages 2nd Edition by Allen B Tucker, Robert E Noonan Concepts of Programming Languages 9th Edition by Robert W Sebesta If yes to either, can you share your opinions about your personal experience using them. I...
Hi, I have notice that Ashcroft, Mermin and Wei worked at a revised edition of the original solid state physics book (here). The book, however, seems to be never available. I have also read that the reason is related to some disputes related to copyright. Do you have any further information about it? Did you have the opportunity to get your hands on this revised edition? I am really curious about it, also considering that I am planning to buy the book in the near future... Thanks!
I’ve heard that in some countries (for example, Argentina), the curriculum is structured differently from the typical American program. In the U.S., students usually take a general physics course first, then move on to a textbook like Griffiths, and only encounter Jackson at the graduate level. In contrast, in those countries students go through a general physics course (such as Resnick-Halliday) and then proceed directly to Jackson. If the slower, more gradual approach is considered...

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
7K
Replies
16
Views
6K
Replies
11
Views
7K
Replies
10
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
21K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Back
Top