Good linear algebra book (for engineers)?

AI Thread Summary
In a discussion about suitable linear algebra books for engineering majors, several titles were highlighted. Axler's book was mentioned as a self-taught resource, but it may not suit all learners. Strang, Bretscher, and Anton were noted for having mixed reviews on Amazon. Poole's "Linear Algebra: A Modern Introduction" received praise for its intuitive and visual approach, making it particularly beneficial for visual learners. It covers essential concepts with geometric representations, although it may not align with more abstract mathematical styles. Lang's "Introduction to Linear Algebra" was also discussed, noted for its elementary nature and good illustrations, but it lacks application coverage and is more theoretical. Overall, the recommendations emphasize the importance of choosing a book that aligns with the learner's style, whether visual or more abstract, while considering the practical applications relevant to engineering.
thrill3rnit3
Gold Member
Messages
716
Reaction score
1
Hello everyone. My friend was asking me for a good linear algebra book. He's an engineering major. I taught myself out of Axler, so I have no clue of a book that would serve his purpose.

Any suggestions? I did an Amazon search and a few names popped out: Strang, Bretscher (sp?), Anton...and they all seemed to have mixed reviews.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
https://www.amazon.com/dp/0387708723/?tag=pfamazon01-20

This book is geared toward statistics, but it seems to be pretty good for most applied purposes. The order in which topics are presented is a bit idiosyncratic, so it may not be a good choice for supplementing a class that uses a different book.
 
Poole - Linear Algebra: A Modern Introduction: https://www.amazon.com/dp/0534341748/?tag=pfamazon01-20

This book is intuitive, visual, and motivating; it also has a lot of applications. The methods used in this book are the only way I would get anything out of linear algebra. In my Diffy Q/LA class, the first day we started linear algebra we immediately started off talking about Rn so I just took the entire subject as one big abstraction. Out of pure frustration, I found this book at my library and I was blow away by the amount of geometric representations of literally every topic covered in my class. Basis, vector space, eigenstuff, determinants, linear independence, etc. Everything suddenly clicked because I am a visual learner.

Note: to a pure mathematician I'm sure they would scuff at a book like this but I really don't know why. If you look across the reviews of several editions some of these people come up and yell about "rigor" but the CS, engineering, physics majors all love this book. This book teaches the concepts in full form along with computational problems and it also has proofs. It's just not like Axler's style --> definition, theorem, proof constantly. If your friend is remotely visual/conceptual have them get this book and thank me later. If they live in an abstract, pure math snob world then go with a book like Axler. :wink:
 
Lang's Introduction to Linear Algebra might do, but:
It does not cover applications, and it is probably more theoretical than most engineering books.

Also, it deals with R^n mostly (or entirely), mainly n=2,3; but I don't know if this is a problem for engineers. Also, it only covers one term worth of material, so you may need another book, like his Linear Algebra (there's a used copy on amazon for $28.44).

I know the reputation of Lang's books, but this one is quite elementary, has some good illustrations, and the answers at the back. And a new paperback copy costs $23, which is not too bad. Well, at least you can trust Lang to be accurate, books that are too applied often tend to muddle the fundamentals, in my experience.
 
The book is fascinating. If your education includes a typical math degree curriculum, with Lebesgue integration, functional analysis, etc, it teaches QFT with only a passing acquaintance of ordinary QM you would get at HS. However, I would read Lenny Susskind's book on QM first. Purchased a copy straight away, but it will not arrive until the end of December; however, Scribd has a PDF I am now studying. The first part introduces distribution theory (and other related concepts), which...
I've gone through the Standard turbulence textbooks such as Pope's Turbulent Flows and Wilcox' Turbulent modelling for CFD which mostly Covers RANS and the closure models. I want to jump more into DNS but most of the work i've been able to come across is too "practical" and not much explanation of the theory behind it. I wonder if there is a book that takes a theoretical approach to Turbulence starting from the full Navier Stokes Equations and developing from there, instead of jumping from...
Back
Top