Good resource to teach myself E&M

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter stinlin
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    E&m Resource
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around recommendations for self-study resources in Electricity and Magnetism (E&M) and optics, particularly for a student looking to test out of a related course. Participants share their opinions on various textbooks and their suitability for different levels of understanding.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses a desire to learn E&M and optics thoroughly to test out of a class.
  • Several participants recommend Griffiths' "Introduction to Electrodynamics" as a primary resource.
  • Another participant suggests having multiple books on the same subject for a broader understanding.
  • Hecht is recommended for optics, although one participant notes it may contain more material than necessary.
  • There is a discussion about the course level, with questions about whether it is introductory or intermediate, affecting the choice of textbooks.
  • Some participants argue that Griffiths may be too advanced for an introductory course, suggesting alternatives like Halliday & Resnick or Tipler/Mosca.
  • One participant mentions Nayfeh and Brussel's "Electricity and Magnetism" for upper-division courses due to its numerous worked examples.
  • A participant shares a personal preference for Lorrain, Lorrain, and Corson's book, citing its clarity and structure.
  • Concerns are raised about the readability and learning effectiveness of the recommended books.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the value of Griffiths' book, but there is disagreement regarding its appropriateness for the specific course level. Multiple competing views on the best resources remain, and the discussion does not reach a consensus on a single recommended textbook.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the course is described as introductory, with only a basic mechanics course as a prerequisite. There are concerns about the quality of the recommended textbook for the course, which may influence the choice of self-study materials.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for students preparing for courses in Electricity and Magnetism and optics, particularly those interested in self-study and seeking recommendations for textbooks at various levels of complexity.

stinlin
Messages
72
Reaction score
1
I'm looking to test out of my schools Electricity and Optics class (so E&M with optics really). I was wondering what a good book would be to be able to teach myself this topic well. I'm interested in it, so I'm not just going for the whole "take the test, be done with it" sort of thing. I want to learn it, but I'm interested in learning it myself. Not to mention, doing it this way opens up my schedule quite a bit and helps get me on track from switching majors...

Thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The best intro book is INTRODUCTION to ELECTRODYNAMICS by Griffiths.
 
It is best to have many books on the same subject.
 
Get Griffiths' EM book. It's awesome.
 
stinlin said:
I'm looking to test out of my schools Electricity and Optics class (so E&M with optics really).

At what level is this course? Is it part of an introductory calculus-level physics sequence, or is it an intermediate-level course that has the introductory sequence as prerequisite?

If it's an intermediate-level course, then I also suggest Griffiths for the E&M material. For optics, I suggest Hecht. It probably has far more material than you really need, but it's a good read, with lots of discussion-type material and lots of pictures and diagrams.

Doesn't your school's course use a textbook? If it does, which one?
 
Galileo said:
Get Griffiths' EM book. It's awesome.

I wouldn't say awesome, but it's most definitely the standard middle-range E&M book. For say an introduction to E&M for physics majors, use Purcell's book.
 
Is this a lower-division course or an upper-division course? A physics course, or an engineering course?

This is not a subject where I'd skip the opportunity to take a course, unless you knew it was a poor course to begin with.

In any case, for an upper-division course I'll recommend Nayfeh and Brussel, Electricity and Magnetism, again because of the hundreds of worked examples, at least for the strictly E&M part.
 
Awesome replies!

The course is really an introduction class. Kind of...The only course description available is:

Electrostatics, current electricity, electromagnetism, magnetic properties of matter. Electromagnetic waves, geometrical and physical optics.

It's only pre-requisite is our basic mechanics course that all engineers take. The book our school recommends is TERRIBLE. It was part of the series that we used for mechanics. Thankfully I'd had 2 years of advanced physics before coming to Purdue because that class is taught SO terribly. The book we use is Tipler Mosca series.

I'll look into the books you all posted. Are they easy to learn from? That's my biggest thing - readability. :)
 
Just try Griffiths, you'll see. :!)
 
  • #10
Is it this book?

Look for Halliday & Resnick, Physics, Part2, 3rd ed. in the library.

Then there's Purcell, which is a classic, but I don't remember much about it.
 
  • #11
stinlin said:
The course is really an introduction class.

Yes, it looks like second semester of calculus-based General Physics to me. In that case, Griffiths etc. are overkill for your purpose, which is to prep yourself to test out of that course. With intermediate and upper-level textbooks, even if you can follow the material, you'll spend a lot of time on stuff that you're not going to be tested on.

If you don't want to use the book that book your course actually uses, as your main source for studying, get something at a similar level, like Halliday, Resnick and whoever (I can never remember which version is associated with Krane and which one with Walker...). You should still look at Tipler/Mosca, because your test will probably be based on that book.
 
  • #12
My favorite EM book is Lorrain, Lorrain and Corson:

https://www.amazon.com/dp/0716718235/?tag=pfamazon01-20

It is less well known than Griffiths but I find it extremely clear, well-structured (in small chapters, one "lecture" each), rigorous and not too fancy. Nice problem set too. The nice thing about it is that you can pick out the pieces that you're interested in.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
9K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K