Good Searching Advice for Engineers: Tips for Better Results

  • Thread starter Thread starter FredGarvin
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Engineers often struggle with search engines like Google due to the overwhelming amount of generic information available. Persistence is key, as many give up too soon when searching for specific technical data. An iterative approach to refining searches can yield better results, emphasizing the importance of using precise keywords and combinations. Familiarity with specific sites can also enhance the effectiveness of searches. This discussion highlights the need for engineers to adopt better searching strategies to improve their access to relevant technical information.
FredGarvin
Science Advisor
Messages
5,093
Reaction score
10
I came across an editorial on internet searching in relation to the engineer. I think it applies very well to the entirety of PF, especially to those who may be a bit daunted when they are told to go to Google.

If you're like most of your engineering peers, you have a love-hate relationship with search engines. On the one hand, generic services like Google and Yahoo hold out the promise of fast access to free technical information. On the other, though, these sites rarely serve up the information you really need — at least not without a fight...

According to Kmetz, one of the biggest mistakes engineers make when searching for technical information is that they give up too soon. "You have to be persistent," he advises. And persistence means an iterative approach to searches.

The entire article is here:
http://www.designnews.com/blog/1130000113.html

I think this article is worth the read for everyone. I tend to do a fair amount of searching and have gotten to a reasonable level of success. However, I have had to try a lot of different things.

Hopefully some people who are frustrated with trying to find technical information can get a little insight in how to be more successful in their searching.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Engineering news on Phys.org
I definitely agree. Part of the problem is that there are so many sites with 'similar' information, but not quite right. One then has to sift through the chaffe to get the grains, or the dirt to get to the nuggets.

I try to be very specific with "keywords","and combinations" in order to narrow down as much as possible.

It also helps to know specific sites.

Thanks for the post Fred.
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...
Back
Top