Google vs IBM Watson: The Power of Search in Jeopardy!

  • Thread starter Thread starter Vinni
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Google
AI Thread Summary
IBM's Watson is impressive, but its capabilities are compared unfavorably to Google when it comes to answering questions on Jeopardy. The discussion highlights that Watson seems to perform searches similar to Google, using a probabilistic algorithm to parse results and formulate answers. It is suggested that even basic PCs or smartphones could achieve similar results by utilizing Google search. The effectiveness of Watson is questioned, especially since it failed to recognize a straightforward answer like "What is Pinky and the Brain," indicating that its search capabilities may not surpass Google's. Additionally, Watson lacks functionalities like voice recognition, which is standard in many consumer devices, including smartphones and Kinect technology. The potential for integrating such technology into a system that could interact with contestants and respond to commands is also mentioned.
Vinni
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
IBM's Watson looks very impressive...But try using Google for the Answers or hints on Jeopardy. Guess what, if you had access to Google you'd score on Jeopardy! So what Watson appears to be doing is performing a search with something similar to Google and then parsing out the search hit results and using some kind of priority or probabilistic algorithm to formalize the "What" or "Who" question. It only takes the very first page of a Google search to get a good hit for Jeopardy.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o6oS64Bpx0g&feature=related

Any PC or for that matter a smart phone could parse out the search hit results from Google and formalize a "Who" or "What" question...
 
Technology news on Phys.org
Also note that the answer to "What is Pinky and the Brain" get's a hit on Google on the first line! Since Watson didn't respond to that answer it would appear that IBM's search engine isn't as good as Google's.
 
Watson doesn't even have the ability to answer to his name or is able to convert voice into text! Something that most PCs and Smart phones can do, also the Kinect can do such tasks as well.

http://ibmresearchnews.blogspot.com/2010/12/how-watson-sees-hears-and-speaks-to.html

I mean if one were to use Kinect or technology like it, such a system could identify contestants, the host and remember their names and respond to questions or commands directed at it!
 
Dear Peeps I have posted a few questions about programing on this sectio of the PF forum. I want to ask you veterans how you folks learn program in assembly and about computer architecture for the x86 family. In addition to finish learning C, I am also reading the book From bits to Gates to C and Beyond. In the book, it uses the mini LC3 assembly language. I also have books on assembly programming and computer architecture. The few famous ones i have are Computer Organization and...
I have a quick questions. I am going through a book on C programming on my own. Afterwards, I plan to go through something call data structures and algorithms on my own also in C. I also need to learn C++, Matlab and for personal interest Haskell. For the two topic of data structures and algorithms, I understand there are standard ones across all programming languages. After learning it through C, what would be the biggest issue when trying to implement the same data...
Back
Top