GPA Started off Bad, any chance?

  • Thread starter Thread starter SiuKing666
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gpa
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the challenges of improving GPA in a Physics BSc program after a poor first year. The individual is currently in Year 2 and experiencing better grades, but is concerned about the overall GPA affecting future graduate school admissions. Key strategies suggested include focusing on excelling in more challenging courses, gaining research experience or internships to enhance applications, and obtaining strong recommendations from professors. The importance of GRE scores is also highlighted, as they can play a significant role in graduate admissions. While some professors may consider factors beyond GPA, such as personality and interview performance, maintaining a solid academic record remains crucial. The consensus emphasizes the need to balance undergraduate coursework with efforts to demonstrate capability through research and strong performance in all classes.
SiuKing666
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

I am currently in my Year 2 study in BSC. Physics
my GPA was nowhere near good in year 1, because I wasn't familiar with how university works, and everything in the courses was new to me. (I don't mind posting the numerical value here if it helps analyzing my situation)
PS: My major GPA >> Cumulative GPA

So anyway, now that in year 2 i know what's going on, I am getting better grades in my courses
now and my GPA is climbing up; but still I know I will have a hard time compensating and eventually when I graduate, my GPA won't be in the category of "excellent".

I am just going to ask, I really want to pursue a career in Physics, and most of the time a post-grad degree is always preferred (given not everyone is Einstein or Schrodinger), I just want to know, if my GPA is not a sure-win, say...barely/just enough, is there any means I can increase my chance of admission?

I have read some articles and so far I have saw these suggestions:
- Try getting good grades in more difficult courses, as they may outweigh the crappy grades in easy courses (my year 1 mess)
- Try attending a few post-grad level courses and get good grades on the transcript to show people your ability
- Get research experience/internship to show you can do something

Some professors also told me GPA is not such a big thing when they admit students, they also look at your interview/resume/personality etc etc. But it varies from professor to professor, everyone has their own standard;
can someone share your experience?
did anyone not get a decent gpa but managed to do something to turn the table?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
SiuKing666 said:
I have read some articles and so far I have saw these suggestions:
- Try getting good grades in more difficult courses, as they may outweigh the crappy grades in easy courses (my year 1 mess)
- Try attending a few post-grad level courses and get good grades on the transcript to show people your ability
- Get research experience/internship to show you can do something

Listen to what your professors say!

But also follow this piece of advice:
"Get research experience/internship to show you can do something"

Your graduate application will go much better with great recommendations from your professors, so it helps to show them your interest and ability by working in a research lab. The second item is GRE scores which pass the cutoff for the program where you are applying.

I don't think that taking a few "hard graduate courses" will show much - you will do better to focus on your undergraduate studies. After all, they are the pre-reqs for the graduate courses ... how well do you think you will do in graduate statistical mechanics if you have not taken the undergrad pre-reqs?


And make sure you get the best grades you can in those "easy" classes; they show that you are interested, and they will improve your GPA.
 
SiuKing666 said:
most of the time a post-grad degree is always preferred (given not everyone is Einstein or Schrodinger)

Einstein got his Ph.D. in 1905 at the University of Zurich.

Schrodinger got his habilitation (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Habilitation) in 1914 at the University of Vienna.

So even if you *are* Einstein or Schodinger, a post-grad degree is necessary. :smile:

And I would say "necessary", not "preferred".

You have time, but not much, to get your act together...
 
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
783
Replies
26
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Back
Top