Gravity Theories: GR vs Alternatives - Post 2018

In summary, Einstein's General Theory of Relativity (GR) is the most accurate theory of gravity and remains dominant in the scientific community. Alternative theories proposed after 2018, such as MOND, TeVeS, and Emergent Gravity, differ from GR in their treatment of spacetime and their equations and predictions for extreme conditions. Currently, there is no conclusive evidence to support or refute these theories, but ongoing experiments and missions, such as LISA and EHT, aim to further test and potentially validate or refute them.
  • #1
andrew s 1905
238
95
TL;DR Summary
I am looking for a recent overview of the status of GR and alternative theories of gravity.
As per the summary I would like to find a review paper, monograph or book. Google is not find any recent reviews. Post 2018 would be ideal. Thanks for any pointers.

Regards Andrew
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
  • Like
Likes andrew s 1905

What is the difference between General Relativity (GR) and alternative theories of gravity?

General Relativity is a theory of gravity proposed by Albert Einstein in 1915. It describes gravity as the curvature of spacetime caused by the presence of mass and energy. Alternative theories of gravity, on the other hand, propose different explanations for how gravity works and may offer different predictions about the behavior of gravity in extreme conditions.

Why do scientists continue to study alternative theories of gravity if General Relativity has been successful in explaining many phenomena?

While General Relativity has been successful in explaining many observations, it is not a complete theory and has limitations. Scientists continue to study alternative theories of gravity to better understand the nature of gravity and to potentially resolve some of the inconsistencies between General Relativity and other theories, such as quantum mechanics.

What are some examples of alternative theories of gravity that have been proposed?

Some examples of alternative theories of gravity include Modified Newtonian Dynamics (MOND), Scalar-Tensor-Vector Gravity (STVG), and Loop Quantum Gravity (LQG). These theories propose modifications to General Relativity in order to explain observations that cannot be fully explained by General Relativity alone.

What evidence supports General Relativity over alternative theories of gravity?

General Relativity has been extensively tested and has been shown to accurately predict the behavior of gravity in a variety of settings, including the orbits of planets, the bending of starlight by massive objects, and the behavior of gravitational waves. Additionally, many alternative theories of gravity have not yet been extensively tested or have not been able to fully explain all of the observations that General Relativity can.

What are some current research efforts in the field of gravity theories, specifically General Relativity vs alternative theories?

Current research efforts in the field of gravity theories include testing alternative theories of gravity through observations of the behavior of galaxies and the large-scale structure of the universe, as well as experiments involving gravitational waves. Scientists are also working to develop new theoretical frameworks that can reconcile General Relativity with other theories, such as quantum mechanics, in order to create a more complete understanding of gravity.

Similar threads

  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
50
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
3
Views
874
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
1
Views
663
Back
Top