Gradient of Vector A: What Does It Mean?

  • Thread starter Thread starter enricfemi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gradient Vector
enricfemi
Messages
195
Reaction score
0
\nabla\stackrel{\rightarrow}{A}

when a gradient operater act on a vector,what is it stand for ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
enricfemi said:
\nabla\stackrel{\rightarrow}{A}

when a gradient operater act on a vector,what is it stand for ?

Visually, what you wrote looks like

\nabla_{\vec A}

The title of the thread and your LaTeX suggests you meant

\nabla \vec A

These are two different things. The first is an operator, the gradient with respect to the components of \vec A, rather than the normal gradient which is take with respect to spatial components. The second form is the gradient of a vector. It is a second-order tensor. If \vec A = \sum_k a_k \hat x_k,

(\nabla \vec A)_{i,j} = \frac{\partial a_i}{\partial x_j}

BTW, it is best not to separate things the way you did in the original post. Here is your original equation as-is:

\nabla\stackrel{\rightarrow}{A}

Now look at how this appears when written as a single LaTeX equation:

\nabla\stackrel{\rightarrow}{A}
 
Last edited:
D H said:
The second form is the gradient of a vector. It is a second-order tensor. If \vec A = \sum_k a_k \hat x_k,

(\nabla \vec A)_{i,j} = \frac{\partial a_i}{\partial x_j}

Does this make a matrix using row i and column j for the entries?
 
Yes.
 
Thank you.
 
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
The value of H equals ## 10^{3}## in natural units, According to : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_units, ## t \sim 10^{-21} sec = 10^{21} Hz ##, and since ## \text{GeV} \sim 10^{24} \text{Hz } ##, ## GeV \sim 10^{24} \times 10^{-21} = 10^3 ## in natural units. So is this conversion correct? Also in the above formula, can I convert H to that natural units , since it’s a constant, while keeping k in Hz ?
Back
Top