Discussion Overview
The discussion revolves around the implications of graduate programs not requiring the GRE for admission. Participants explore whether this absence is a negative indicator of program quality or simply a reflection of admission committee preferences. The conversation touches on the role of the GRE in evaluating student capabilities, the potential need for alternative measures, and the broader implications for applicants.
Discussion Character
- Debate/contested
- Conceptual clarification
- Exploratory
Main Points Raised
- Some participants question whether the absence of the GRE is a bad sign, suggesting it might indicate a reliance on other criteria for assessing student capability.
- Others argue that the GRE serves as a counterbalance to GPA, allowing schools to admit students who may have lower GPAs than expected based on their knowledge.
- A participant expresses concern that programs not requiring the GRE may lead to a less rigorous admission process, comparing it to admitting underprepared students.
- Some participants propose that a better assessment method could be a department-specific test rather than a standardized GRE, which they view as a money-making scheme rather than a true measure of knowledge.
- There are differing opinions on the effectiveness of the GRE, with some asserting that it emphasizes test-taking strategies over actual knowledge, while others share personal experiences of success with the GRE through traditional study methods.
Areas of Agreement / Disagreement
Participants express a range of views, with no clear consensus on whether the absence of the GRE is beneficial or detrimental. Some see it as a potential risk, while others defend the decision as a reflection of evolving admission standards.
Contextual Notes
Participants highlight various assumptions regarding the GRE's role in admissions, the potential for alternative assessment methods, and the implications of relying solely on GPA. There is also a discussion about the financial aspects of standardized testing.
Who May Find This Useful
Individuals considering graduate programs, educators involved in admissions processes, and those interested in the evolving standards of academic evaluation may find this discussion relevant.