Schools Graduate School Focus: 3 Years of Solar Plasma Physics Research

AI Thread Summary
Entering the second year as an astronomy and physics double major, the individual has secured a full-time position at NASA Godard Space Flight Center, working on solar plasma physics research. They have been offered a three-year role, which they accepted, but are contemplating whether to pursue graduate studies in solar plasma physics if their interests shift. The discussion emphasizes the value of this opportunity for gaining experience and knowledge, suggesting that such a background would enhance their graduate school applications, regardless of the specific field chosen. It is noted that graduate admissions committees appreciate diverse research experiences and that the mentorship received during this position could be invaluable for future career decisions. Overall, the consensus encourages embracing the opportunity while remaining open to exploring various interests in the field.
MikeBeer
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Hey everyone, I'm entering my second undergraduate year as an astronomy and physics double major. I've always had an interest in black holes, high energy astrophysics, and cosmology; consequentially, I've planned to study one of these in graduate school. However, over the summer I've been working full-time at NASA Godard Space Flight Center for two scientists on the STEREO spacecraft doing solar plasma physics research. We haven't gotten too deep into detail yet, but I still enjoy it. To get to the point, they just offered me job to stay and work for them until I graduate, so for the next 3 years, which I took without hesitation. They made it a point to let me know I can stop at any time I lose interest or decide not to move forward. My question is this - if after the 3 years my interest in solar plasma physics doesn't match up my interest in other topics, would you still suggest I go to graduate school for it since I'll have so much experience? The two scientists I work for said by the end of three years I'll know as much about plasma physics as any 3rd year graduate student, so naturally it seems like it would definitely be easier to succeed in graduate school with such a deep understanding. I know I still have plenty of time to decide, but I just don't want to regret my choice later on in my career. What do you guys think?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
My advice would be to take it for what it is: an excellent opportunity to advance your understanding of physics and gain some valuable research experience. While this position will certainly give you an advantage if you decide to continue in space/plasma physics, by no means will you be limited to graduate study in that area.

Graduate admissions committees understand that undergraduates need to explore different areas and that often decisions about research are made based on the available opportunities at the time.

This sounds like a great position with some mentors that are willing to help you out in your career. Best of luck.
 
A gree with Choppy- you have an excellent opportunity to work with mentors who seem genuinely interested in you. That's a benefit that goes well beyond any specific knowledge you will pick up.
 
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...

Similar threads

Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
32
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Back
Top