Graduating with physics undergrad, need some advice

  • Thread starter Thread starter timman_24
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics Undergrad
AI Thread Summary
Graduating soon and preparing for graduate school applications, the individual expresses a desire to move away from pure physics towards a more hands-on field, specifically nuclear engineering. They are concerned about the compatibility of their physics background with engineering curricula and whether their 3.8 GPA will be sufficient for admission to reputable programs. Responses indicate that many engineering departments value physics backgrounds, particularly for fields like nuclear engineering, where foundational knowledge in electromagnetism, thermodynamics, and mathematics is beneficial. Examples of successful transitions from physics to engineering, including electrical engineering and materials science, are shared, reinforcing that a physics degree can be an asset. The individual is encouraged to pursue applied plasma/fusion technologies and sustainable energies, which align with their interests and could enhance their career prospects. Overall, the discussion highlights the feasibility of transitioning from physics to engineering graduate programs and the importance of selecting specializations that resonate with personal interests.
timman_24
Messages
52
Reaction score
0
I am going to graduate soon and am getting my applications ready for graduate school. I know I do not want to continue in pure physics. I want something more "hands on." I also want something in a cutting edge field. I've always liked the idea of nuclear engineering and did well in EM, thermo, and mathematics. Am I desirable going from a pure science background in physics when applying for graduate school in engineering? I looked over the curriculum in engineering and it seems that they don't quite sync up well with what I took except for the mathematics, thermo, and stat.

Will I have a hard time getting into a reputable college with my degree? I have around a 3.8 gpa right now.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Timman_24,

Many graduate engineering departments are happy to accept students with physics backgrounds. I went to graduate school (electrical engineering) and work with a lot of people that were in your situation. You will have to pick fields/specializations that interest you, of course. If it is nuclear engineering then physics is a great background - where I went to school didn't even have an undergrad nuclear program; they suggested "engineering physics" as a background (which meant EM, statistical physics, mechanics, Quantum mechanics, continuum physics, math methods, experimental physics, circuits, and a handful of electives from engineering and physics).

If you are interested in physics related topics, you should be in especially good shape. I know folks with physics backrounds who have graduate degrees in electrical engineering (solid state devices, radiowave propagation, signal processing), materials science, and aerospace engineering (control systems, space systems). My wife has undergrad degree in math, went to physics grad school for a couple of years - when her advisor left she was stranded, so transferred to another university where she earned a phd in electrical engineering. If I think harder I can probably recall a few more folks whose background was physics, but these pop to mind immediately.

I think you should be fine. I wish you the best of luck,

jason
 
Thanks for your reply. That makes me feel much better. I do enjoy the topics in physics but I am craving something more applied. The school I am currently applying to has an option for applied plasma/fusion technologies along with a certificate in sustainable energies. I think tacking these onto my degree program will give me a great head start in a future career.

Very exciting. Can't wait to graduate out of undergrad.
 
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...

Similar threads

Back
Top