Grams of H2 react with 28.0 grams of N2

Thread starter Chuck Norris
Start date Oct 28, 2009
Tags

Grams

AI Thread Summary

To determine the grams of H2 needed to react with 28.0 grams of N2, the balanced chemical equation for the reaction is essential. The stoichiometry indicates that 3 grams of H2 react with 1 gram of N2. Calculating based on this ratio, 28.0 grams of N2 would require 42.0 grams of H2. The initial confusion between 14 grams and 6 grams stems from miscalculations in applying the stoichiometric ratios. Accurate calculations confirm that 42.0 grams of H2 is necessary for the reaction with 28.0 grams of N2.

Oct 28, 2009

Chuck Norris

Homework Statement

how many grams of H2 are needed to react with 28.0 grams of N2?

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution

I believe the answer to be 14 grams or 6 grams. I keep going back and forth between the 2. Any help would be greatly appreciated, thanks!

Physics news on Phys.org

Oct 28, 2009

Bohrok

Show your work so we can see where you're having trouble.

Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'

TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...

View full post »

Thread 'Prove that evolution is constant (Provide at least two arguments to support your position)'

I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

View full post »