Graphene Hamiltonian: Eq.(1) in PRB 81, 205444

hokhani
Messages
561
Reaction score
18
As far as I know, the Hamiltonian of graphene in the Bloch's sums |A\rangle and |B\rangle near the points K or K' is a 2 \times 2 matrix with the components: \langle A|H|A\rangle, \langle A|H|B\rangle, \langle B|H|A\rangle,\langle B|H|B\rangle which all are parameters (and not variables). But in the Eq.(1) in PHYSICAL REVIEW B 81, 205444 (2010) (http://journals.aps.org/prb/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevB.81.205444) these components are functions and operators in terms of (x,y). Could anyone please tell me how to obtain this formula?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The tight-binding model to Dirac-Weyl equation derivation is outlined in the review by Castro Neto et al http://arxiv.org/abs/0709.1163 (Sect. II.B), as well as in these notes https://www.tfkp.physik.uni-erlangen.de/download/research/DW-derivation.pdf, which have a few more details of the steps.
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top