Graphic representation of xantoprotheic reaction

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around the xantoprotheic reaction observed in a lab experiment, where a protein reacts with sodium nitrate and sodium hydroxide, resulting in a yellow precipitate. The participant is seeking a clear graphic representation of the reaction, noting confusion about the final product's identity, which is suspected to be a xanthoprotein. They highlight that the yellow precipitate is not simply a salt and suggest that the protein undergoes modification leading to insolubility, possibly forming aromatic carboxylic acids. The conversation emphasizes the need for clarity on how the yellow compound is formed and its properties, particularly its density and solubility. Overall, the thread reflects a quest for deeper understanding of the chemical processes involved in the xantoprotheic reaction.
Weissritter
Messages
37
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


O hai,[STRIKE] my minions.
[/STRIKE]
So...we made the xantoprotheic reaction in the lab, but I have to attach the representation of the reaction. I haven't found it anywhere. So I came to you.

Homework Equations


Protein + NaNO3→(180s@373K)→(room temp) + NaOH→ Weird yellow precipitate, possibly more than two compounds

The Attempt at a Solution


I'm clueless about the answer. It could be NaNO3, but that salt is white, and not yellow, so something else could appear in the final result. What I am missing?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I was able to google the answer is 2 minutes. It is not a salt. Protein gets modified in a way that makes it insoluble (and no, it is not just a simple denaturation).
 
After some weird results, the answer is apparently a xanthoprotein. Most of sources, however, simply say "the yellow thing is a xanthoprotein", while never saying how it is made. On another source, it simply says "becomes yellow because nitro-compounds are formed.
But wait! Borek said they become insoluble...that means it is either a very high, or very low density compound, which could mean the huge protein is...broken into not-so-huge aromatic, carboxylic acids, possibly?
Also, they become sort of solid, which means the yellow thing, if organic, is a long-chain compound, which makes it solid. The long chain also means it becomes apolar and water-non-soluble.
So...aromatic generic carboxyacids, maybe? Maybe that's a xanthoprotein.
And yes, I looked at the preffix 'xantho-'. It is a category of crabs. Not very useful,
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

Similar threads

Back
Top