Graphical link between function and derivate

  • Thread starter Thread starter mad
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function Link
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding the relationship between a function and its derivative, specifically using the example of y = x^2 and its derivative y = 2x. It clarifies that while the derivative's slope is positive, the value of the derivative at negative x-values indicates that the original function is decreasing. The key points highlight that when a function is increasing, its derivative is positive; when decreasing, the derivative is negative; and at points of direction change, the derivative is zero. Visualizing the graphs of both functions can help clarify this relationship. Ultimately, the value of the function at specific points is crucial for understanding the behavior of its derivative.
mad
Messages
65
Reaction score
0
Hello all,
first, excuse my english I don't speak it very well

I have a problem. We have two sheets. One are graphics of functions, and the other are graphics of the derivate of those function. Now my problem is I don't know how link a graphic of a function to the graphic of its derivate. I know that, for example, y = x^2, for ]-oo, 0[ , that the slope (sp?) will be negative. So why , on the graphic of the derivate which is y=2x, is the slope positive? How can I associate a function to its derivate?
thanks a lot
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
If you don't understand what I'm asking, here is an exercice exactly like the one I'm talking about.
http://gmca.eis.uva.es/wims/wims.cgi?lang=es&+module=U1%2Fanalysis%2Fderdraw.en

Choose degree 3 or more and it asks to draw its derivate graphic. But I don't know how
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The gradient function of y = x^2, that is: y = 2x, is negative for values of x less than zero. So, although the slope of the gradient function is positive, you can see that value of the gradient function at say, x = -2 still gives the slope of y = x^2 at x = -2.

The slope of the gradient function would only be negative if the original function was y = -x^2.

It helps to plot the two graphs y = x^2 and y = 2x above and below each other, and matching respective x values on both, to get a feel for what's happening in the gradient function.
 
The relationship is:

When the function is increasing, the derivative is positive

When the function is decreasing, the derivative is negative

When the function is changing direction, the derivative is zero

So, in the case of f(x)=x^2 from -\infty\rightarrow 0 the function is decreasing and the derivative is negative. At the point (0,0) the function changes direction, so the derivative is zero, and from 0\rightarrow\infty the function is increasing so the derivative is positive.
 
Although the slope of 2x is postive, the value of the function is negative.

It is the value of the function which you must be concerned with.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top