Graphing a vertical line on graphing utility

Immutef
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Is it possible to graph a vertical line such as X=2 on a graphing calculator?

How would one graph a vertical line on the graphing calculator?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
just found the answer.

[2ND] [PRGM]
[4]
X=[A]
 
Since you haven't said what "graphing utility" you are using or what those commands do, this makes no sense at all!
 
HallsofIvy said:
Since you haven't said what "graphing utility" you are using or what those commands do, this makes no sense at all!

Sorry. I am using a TI-84 Plus graphing calculator. To graph a vertical line:
Hit the [2ND] key followed by the [PRGM] key.

This brings you to the menu:
1: ClrDraw
2: Line(
3: Horizontal
4: Vertical
5: Tangent
6: Draw
7: Shade
8: DrawInv
9: Circle(
0: Text(
A: Pen

select Vertical by pushing the [4] key

This will take you to the main screen displaying Vertical

If I were trying to graph the equation X=2, I would now push the [2] key.

This process allows one to graph a vertical line on a TI 84 graphing calculator

* I apologize if my question/answer were not phrased clearly, or if this question has been answered before. Is "graphing utility" not the correct word to use? That is the term used in my textbooks.
 
"Graphing utility" is a generic term for a device that can display graphs. If you want advice on how to graph something on a specific device, you need to specify the device you're using, since different devices tend to do things in different ways.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top