Graphite leads in electrolysis

AI Thread Summary
Graphite leads outperform copper leads in electrolysis due to their lower oxidation potential, making them easier to oxidize. The reaction involving carbon produces carbon dioxide gas, which minimizes interference during the process. Although graphite electrodes do deteriorate over time, their cost-effectiveness compared to metals like copper and platinum makes them a preferred choice. Increased bubbling observed with graphite leads indicates more efficient gas production during electrolysis. Overall, graphite's advantages in cost and reaction dynamics make it a superior option for electrolysis applications.
ufarad
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
What is it about graphite leads that make them so much better for electrolysis than, say, copper leads? I tried it both ways, connecting leads to a battery and then sticking them in some water and with the graphite leads there was much more bubbling going on. So what is it about the graphite? Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
CO2 (g) + 4 H+ (aq) + 4 e- --> C (s) + 2 H2O (l) has an E0 of +0.20 V,
making carbon somewhat easier to oxidize than copper (E0 = +0.34).

So carbon electrodes do deteriorate slowly. The benefit is that their oxidation product (carbon dioxide) is a gas,
so it doesn't interfere much. And that carbon is simply a lot cheaper than e.g. copper (and especially platinum).
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top