Grappling with a Magnetism question

  • Thread starter Thread starter sharpstones
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Magnetism
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on understanding the magnetic field (B field) in a coaxial cable using Ampere's Law and Biot-Savart's Law. It highlights that the B field in the space between the inner and outer cables is influenced solely by the current in the inner wire, as contributions from the outer wire cancel out. The inquiry also touches on the behavior of a hollow cylindrical conductor, confirming that no B field exists within it due to similar cancellation effects. Additionally, the B field's dependence on the radial distance from the inner wire is noted, emphasizing that the outer wire's current does not affect the field. Overall, the key takeaway is that the B field's characteristics in coaxial cables are determined primarily by the inner conductor's current.
sharpstones
Messages
25
Reaction score
3
When analyzing a coaxial cable and trying to find the B field in the space betwen the outer and inner cables, using ampere's law the B field will be depedent only upon the current running through the inner wire.

Why is this? I know that yes Ampere's law says that only the current contained within the amperean loop can cause a B field, but i want a better explanation then that. Let's suppose there was just a plain hollow cylindrical conductor with current running through it. Would there be a B field running through it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The better explanation is in writing the field due to several elemental sections of the conductor, using Biot-Savart's Law and integrating over the entire conductor. Unfortunately, it's a mathematical explanation, not a physical demonstration.

The only physical thing that can be said (this amy seem obvious) is that the contributions from different parts of the conductor cancel each other out in the case of say, the hollow conductor. So, the answer to that part is "No, there will be no field inside a hollow cylindrical conductor".

To answer the first part, the B-field is not dependent on only the current. It is also dependent, in this case, on the radial distance of the particular point.
 
regarding the first part. I wasn't very specific... what I ment was that i was suprised to find that it was dependent upon the curreny on the inner wire, but non dependent at all on the outer concentric wire.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top