Gravimetric Analysis- precipitation method

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a gravimetric analysis problem involving the precipitation of silver chloride from a hydrated metal chloride. The user is attempting to calculate the percentage of chlorine in the hydrate and the relative atomic mass of the metal, M. Key calculations include determining the number of moles of AgCl produced and the corresponding mass of chlorine, which is found to be 0.305g. There is confusion regarding how to relate the percentage of chlorine in AgCl to that in the original hydrated chloride, with clarification needed on calculating the molar mass of MCl2.2H2O. The conversation emphasizes the importance of treating each compound's percentages separately and following a logical sequence in calculations.
leah3000
Messages
41
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



1.046g of the hydrated chloride of a certain metal were dissolved in water and silver chloride was precipitated by the addition of a slight excess of silver nitrate solution. After purification the silver chloride had a mass of 1.231g. Calculate the percentage of chlorine in the hydrate. If it is of the form, MCl2.2H2O, calculate the relative atomic mass of the metal, M.


Homework Equations



My attempt at a balanced equation for this:

XCl.xH2O + H2O + AgNO3 ---> AgCl + XNO3

not sure if that's correct

The Attempt at a Solution



no. of mols AgCl produced = Mass/ Mr = 1.231/(108)+(35.5) = 8.58x 10^-3 mols AgCl

From the equation, I assumed a 1:1 ration between AgCl and the hydrated chloride.
Hence, no. of mols hydrated chloride = 8.58x10^-3.

I was trying to calculate the Mr of the hydrated chloride but how do i calculate this if i have 2 variables? The mass of the element X and the no. of mols of water?

I was thinking i'd need to calculate the Mr and then divide the mass of chlorine by the Mr of the compound...then multiply by 100 to find the %:confused:

Can someone please help me!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are making it harder than it really is. What is mass of chlorine in 1.231g of AgCl? Once you know mass of Cl, calculating its percentage is a breeze.

Now, how many moles of Cl? How many moles of MCl2? Molar mass of MCl2.2H2O? Molar mass of M?

--
methods
 
Borek said:
You are making it harder than it really is. What is mass of chlorine in 1.231g of AgCl? Once you know mass of Cl, calculating its percentage is a breeze.

Now, how many moles of Cl? How many moles of MCl2? Molar mass of MCl2.2H2O? Molar mass of M?

--
chemical calculators - buffer calculator, concentration calculator
www.titrations.info - all about titration methods



ok so to calculate the mass of Cl do i still use the no. of mols as 8.58x10^-3? which could then give a mass of 0.305g?

Also if i use this mass to calculate the percentage of Cl, wouldn't that give me the percentage in AgCl (24.8%)? So then do i just subtract this from 100 to get the percentage in the hydrated halide (75.2%)?

I'm really not sure about this...can u explain the MCl2.2H2O part please.
 
leah3000 said:
ok so to calculate the mass of Cl do i still use the no. of mols as 8.58x10^-3? which could then give a mass of 0.305g?

This is correct mass of chlorine.

Also if i use this mass to calculate the percentage of Cl, wouldn't that give me the percentage in AgCl (24.8%)?

You can as well use this mass to calculate percentage of chloride in the original chloride - you were given the mass, and you can be sure 0.305g is also a mass of chlorides in the original sample. There is no other source of chlorides.

So then do i just subtract this from 100 to get the percentage in the hydrated halide (75.2%)?

No, that's completely off and these numbers are unrelated. When it comes to percentages you need to look at each compound separately.

I'm really not sure about this...can u explain the MCl2.2H2O part please.

Try to answer questions I have already asked (in the order they were asked, using answer to the previous one to find answer to the next). How many moles of Cl? How many moles of MCl2? Molar mass of MCl2.2H2O? Molar mass of M?

--
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top