Gravitation and Motion Equations

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the standard equations of motion, which describe motion under constant acceleration, and how they can be adapted to include gravitational effects. Gravitation is expressed as a force that must be converted into acceleration for use in motion equations, leading to the derived gravitational acceleration formula. Despite attempts to incorporate gravitational acceleration into motion equations, the resulting motion remains parabolic due to the variable nature of "r," which changes with the object's position. The poster seeks a unified equation that accurately calculates motion under gravitational influence without relying on iterative methods. The inquiry highlights the limitations of current equations in capturing the complexities of motion influenced by gravity.
Sobeita
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
The standard equation for motion is:

X= .5 * ax * t^2 + vx * t (+ cx)
Y= .5 * ay * t^2 + vy * t (+ cy)

...and of course, you can expand it to include more axes and more orders if you like.

Gravitation is a force, but to use it in the motion equation, you need it in acceleration form.

Fg= G * mM / r^2;
F= m*a; Ag = Fg/m;
Ag= G * M / r^2.

But if you use substitution, using Ag, the motion equation is still always parabolic, despite what we know about orbits. The cause is obviously the presence of the "r" variable, which is dependent on the position of the object (so that acceleration changes based on its position, and that position affects the acceleration, and both change continuously.)

With an iterative approach, I am able to approximate motion due to gravitation. The result is essentially a long string of parabolas.

Is there a way to combine these two equations, Ag and motion, into a true unified equation?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sobeita said:
The standard equation for motion is:

X= .5 * ax * t^2 + vx * t (+ cx)
Y= .5 * ay * t^2 + vy * t (+ cy)
These equations only apply to motion with constant acceleration; they are not true in general.
 
That was more or less the purpose of posting this question. Is there an equation that can calculate motion due to gravitation, without using some sort of sigma iteration approach?
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top