Is Gravity Involved in the Motion of a Pendulum After a Collision?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the role of gravity in the motion of a pendulum after a bullet collides with it. Participants agree that gravity should be included in a free body diagram, particularly when analyzing the pendulum's upward motion post-collision. The conversation highlights that the problem can be approached through impulse and momentum, but also suggests that a force-based analysis could yield a differential equation of motion for the pendulum. While the text does account for gravitational potential energy, there is confusion about the necessity of using forces in this context. Ultimately, the discussion emphasizes the importance of considering gravity in analyzing the pendulum's motion after the impact.
Maxo
Messages
160
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


image.jpg


Homework Equations


∑F=ma

The Attempt at a Solution


This is a problem that can be solved by looking at impulse and momentum and I understand how the problem is solved in the book but I'm wondering about the reasoning before, if this is the only way to look at it. When I look at the picture of what happens, there is a bullet that hits a pendulum so it moves upwards. I would from looking at this assume that when the object (bullet + ballistic pendulum) moves upwards, there is a force of gravity involved. In the way the task has been solved in the book they didn't draw in a free body-diagram showing the forces acting on the objects. What I'm wondering is wouldn't the force of gravity actually be involved after this collision, when the pendulum moves upwards? And then shouldn't it be drawn in a free body diagram?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, gravity should be included in a free body diagram. Is that all you wanted to know?
 
Maxo said:
What I'm wondering is wouldn't the force of gravity actually be involved after this collision, when the pendulum moves upwards?

On the next pages, does the text take gravitational potential energy into account?

Maxo said:
And then shouldn't it be drawn in a free body diagram?

I don't see a free-body diagram. The diagram in the image you posted shows velocities (which aren't on free-body diagrams), and not forces (which are on free-body diagrams).
 
George Jones said:
On the next pages, does the text take gravitational potential energy into account?

Yes it does... which makes sense. But I still don't understand why this problem could also have been solved by looking at the forces in a free body diagram? Or could it?
 
Maxo said:
Yes it does... which makes sense. But I still don't understand why this problem could also have been solved by looking at the forces in a free body diagram? Or could it?
I presume your question is only in regard to the motion after the impact.
If you attempt it by forces and accelerations you will obtain the differential equation of motion of a pendulum. Since it would not be acceptable to make the usual SHM approximation, the equation cannot be solved in general. Time as a variable can be eliminated from the equation to produce an answer to this question, but what that is doing, in effect, is deriving the fact that work is conserved by the forces.
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top