Gravitation Problem: Force of Sphere on Sheet

  • Thread starter Thread starter awri
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gravitation
awri
Messages
35
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


If a uniform sphere of mass M and radius R, is height h above an infinite sheet of uniform density \rho_{s}, what is the gravitational force of the sphere, on the sheet.


Homework Equations


F=\frac{GMm}{R^{2}}; \Phi=\frac{GM}{R}; \nabla\bulletg=4\piG\rho; U=m\Phi; F=-\nablaU


The Attempt at a Solution


My professor advised me to find the force of the sheet on the sphere since that force would be equal to the force of the sphere on the sheet. So I drew a gaussian cylinder around my "sheet" and attempted to calculate g by saying that \nabla\bulletg = \frac{dg}{dz} since all relavent field lines were in the z direction. All I think I need to know is whether or not that was the correct assumption. I don't think it is because it yeilds an answer that looks like 4\piG\rhoz. And the z is an issue. the answer in the back of the book is 2\piGM\rho. Any help would be much appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There is another way to use the gaussian cylinder. There's an equation that relates the surface integral of dA over the cylinder, to the mass within the cylinder. I think that will be useful here.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top