Gravitational Acceleration in Homogeneous Fields

jensel
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
Hi,

Something which I never read in a physics book.
Let us take a homogeneous gravitational field. Now let's take an appel. Let us watching it falling. Now let's cut it into two pieces. If there would be a very short distance, would we really expect that both pieces now fall slower or faster? Do we really expect, if both pieces have different size, different physics? I wouldn't. Now take two apples and so on. Logically you shouldn't see a difference. I think this thought experiment which I never saw in this context may help to understand physics for undergraduates. Thanks for comments.


Jens
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jensel said:
Hi,

Something which I never read in a physics book.
Let us take a homogeneous gravitational field. Now let's take an appel. Let us watching it falling. Now let's cut it into two pieces. If there would be a very short distance, would we really expect that both pieces now fall slower or faster? Do we really expect, if both pieces have different size, different physics? I wouldn't. Now take two apples and so on. Logically you shouldn't see a difference. I think this thought experiment which I never saw in this context may help to understand physics for undergraduates. Thanks for comments.


Jens

You're right - but that's actually very well known. In particular, that is essentially the same argument that Galileo used when he first worked out that different objects should fall with the same acceleration, in around 1600.
 
Jonathan Scott said:
You're right - but that's actually very well known. In particular, that is essentially the same argument that Galileo used when he first worked out that different objects should fall with the same acceleration, in around 1600.

I would never say that this thought is new - I just find this point is not teached very well. I found it surprising that a feather falls down the same way as an iron bar, as a child. For me, it was just measured and astonishing and I find "my" little "thought experiment" very convincing. A feather is influenced by friction. I think that those experiments in mind help to understand physics better. If you explain it in more logical way. I found it working well, when I had students. Logical and symmetrical thoughts are not used in teaching very well, that's my opinion (for example to explain sine function etc.) Thanks.
 
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
So, to calculate a proper time of a worldline in SR using an inertial frame is quite easy. But I struggled a bit using a "rotating frame metric" and now I'm not sure whether I'll do it right. Couls someone point me in the right direction? "What have you tried?" Well, trying to help truly absolute layppl with some variation of a "Circular Twin Paradox" not using an inertial frame of reference for whatevere reason. I thought it would be a bit of a challenge so I made a derivation or...
Back
Top