Gravitational attraction between 3 masses.

AI Thread Summary
To determine where to place a third mass so that the net gravitational force on it is zero, the user set up an equation based on the gravitational force formula. They initially miscalculated the distances and combined masses, leading to confusion about the correct setup. After revising their approach and realizing their mistake, they found that the correct distance resulted in a gravitational force balance. Ultimately, they confirmed that the calculated distance of 1.32 meters from the smaller mass M was accurate. The discussion highlights the importance of careful equation setup in solving gravitational attraction problems.
lsatwd
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A small mass M and a small mass 3M are 3.60m apart. Where should you put a third small mass so that the net gravitational force on it due to the other two masses is zero?(From mass M)


Homework Equations



F = G(m1)(m2)/d^2

The Attempt at a Solution


Code:
I envisioned the problem to originally look like this: 
[1M]                                       [3M]
And adding in the 3rd mass I envisioned it to look something like this:
[1M]    (1M)                               [3M]

I then tried solving the problem by setting the two unknown variables (the distance between the 3rd mass and 1st mass and the 3rd mass and the 2nd mass) like this:
x = Distance between [1M] and (1M)
3.60-x = distance between (1M) and [3m]

I was thinking this would give me an equation looking like this:

G[1M](1M)/x^2 = G(1M)[3M]/(3.60-x)^2

I tried solving this but it's not giving me the right answer... Should the right equation above be G(2M)(3M)/(3.60-x)^2 because of combined mass?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
lsatwd said:
I was thinking this would give me an equation looking like this:

G[1M](1M)/x^2 = G(1M)[3M]/(3.60-x)^2

I tried solving this but it's not giving me the right answer.
As an aside, the test mass does not have to be of mass M; it would be better to write it's mass as m (little m), meaning it has very little mass.

You claimed the quoted equation is "not giving me the right answer." That implies that either you know what the right answer should be or that some agent knows your result is wrong. Show your work.
 
ahh never mind, i see.

It turns out i just suck at math. that equation gave me 1.32 which was the right answer. thanks for the help
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top