Gravitational field has energy, E field does not?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the distinction between gravitational and electric fields regarding energy. A physics lecture suggested that gravitational fields possess energy while electric fields do not, which sparked confusion among participants. It was clarified that both fields have potential energy, but the statement referred to the equivalence of mass and energy in relativity, which does not apply to electric charge. The conversation highlights the lack of an analogous relationship for electric charge compared to gravitational mass. Ultimately, the distinction between the two types of fields and their energy characteristics is emphasized.
csmcmillion
Messages
63
Reaction score
2
Watched a physics lecture yesterday in which the teacher stated that a G field has energy, but an E filed (due to the Coulomb force does not). This does not compute. Both fields have potential energy, yes?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, that doesn't make sense. Are you sure that's what they meant?
 
Pengwuino said:
Yes, that doesn't make sense. Are you sure that's what they meant?

Maybe not. The exact statement was "In an ordinary sense, electric charge is not energy, but gravitational charge is energy". So maybe I am misunderstanding the statement.
 
Okay that clears it up. They are talking about the equivalence between mass and energy that comes out of relativity. There is no analogous equivalence for charge.
 
Back
Top