Gravitational force due to sphere

CyberShot
Messages
133
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement

Consider a thin hollow fixed spherical shell of radius R and surface mass density rho. A particle initially at rest falls in from infinity. What is its speed when it reaches the center of the shell?

(Assume that a tiny hole has been cut in the shell to let the particle thru.)

Known:

rho, distance between centers of masses, R, G

Homework Equations



F = -GMm/r^2

The Attempt at a Solution

The source of the force acts through the center of the sphere, right? So I know the force, but the problem says the particle falls from infinity (I'm assuming I'd need to use calculus here then)

The gravitational force from the sphere acting on the particle is originating from the sphere's center of mass, and pulling it towards that center radially. The part that tricks me is bringing the test particle in from infinity, so the g-force is pretty much zero at that point in time, and slowly increases at it gets closer. Seems like I require an infinite sum here, but not sure how to realize that.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Use conservation of energy. At infinity, the gravitational potential energy is zero, and the particle is in rest, so its KE=0, too. What is the formula for the gravitational potential energy?

When reaching the sphere, and entering into it, getting at a distance r<R from the centre, only that mass attracts the particle that is confined in the sphere of radius r. What is the force in the empty sphere?

ehild
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top