Gravitational Force of Bowling & Billiard Balls - Homework

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the gravitational force between a bowling ball and a billiard ball using the formula F = G(m1m2/r^2). There is confusion regarding whether to add the radii of both balls to determine the distance for the calculation. One participant initially used an incorrect radius sum, leading to discrepancies in their results. After revisiting the calculations, they corrected the denominator but still noted a difference in expected values. The conversation emphasizes the importance of accurate radius measurements and proper calculator usage for scientific calculations.
RKNY
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A bowling ball (mass = 7.2 kg, radius = 0.13 m) and a billiard ball (mass = 0.40 kg, radius = 0.028 m) may each be treated as uniform spheres. What is the magnitude of the maximum gravitational force that each can exert on the other?

Homework Equations


F = G(m1m2/r^2)

The Attempt at a Solution


Im confused about the radius portion of the problem. Shouldn't you add up the radius of both (0.028 + 0.13) and use that answer in the equation?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I would think that's as close as the two could come together and therefore the greatest force would be generated. You seem to imply that this is not the case?
 
denverdoc said:
I would think that's as close as the two could come together and therefore the greatest force would be generated. You seem to imply that this is not the case?

F = G x m1 x m2 / r^2

F = (6.67 x 10^-11) x (7.2) x (0.40) / (0.148) x 2

F = .000000001

Doesn't seem to be right when I go and check it.
 
Last edited:
you have .44 above when the problem states .4, and .148 instead of .158 as you suggested using in the denom. maybe follow suit and go to bed as I intend to now.
 
Last edited:
denverdoc said:
you have .44 above when the problem states .4, and .148 instead of .158 as you suggested using in the denom. maybe follow suit and go to bed as I intend to now.

sorry, I went back and changed everything. Now everything seems to be the way I attempted it.
 
well the denominator still shows 0.148, when its 0.158; also make sure to use exponential entry with your calculator; if it doesn't support such, then use the windows free calculator--use the more advanced of the two available. I get something like 7.7e-9
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top