Gravitational Lagrangian PE term

AI Thread Summary
In a two-body Newtonian gravitation problem, the gravitational force between two masses is given by f=G m1 m2/r^2. The integral of this force with respect to distance r yields a potential energy term of U=-G m1 m2/r. Despite initially assuming that the total potential energy should be doubled due to the presence of two objects, it was found that the correct potential energy is simply U=-G m1 m2/r, as including both forces leads to incorrect equations of motion. The discussion seeks clarification on why only one potential energy term is necessary and how this principle can be extended to N-body systems. Understanding the nature of gravitational interactions is crucial for accurately modeling these systems.
Messages
36,404
Reaction score
15,117
I was just doing a simple 2-body Newtonian gravitation problem. The force on each mass is:

f=\frac{G m_1 m_2}{r^2}

and the integral of the force wrt r is:

\int \! f \, dr = -\frac{G m_1 m_2}{r}

So, since there are two forces in the system, one on each object, I had assumed that there would be two potential energy terms so the total potential energy would be twice the above integral, or:

U = -2\frac{G m_1 m_2}{r}

but I checked my work using Newtonian mechanics it turns out that it gives the wrong equation of motion and the correct potential energy is only one times the integral.

So, my question is, can anyone explain how I should have known to only include one times the energy even though there were two objects, and how I can generalize to N-body problems.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top