Gravitational Potential Calculation

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the gravitational potential of a meteorite that impacts a flat, tabular Earth. The meteorite has a specified density and radius, and it penetrates the Earth to an unknown depth. Participants are exploring the implications of Gauss' Law in this context and how it relates to the gravitational potential above the meteorite.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are discussing the bounds for the integral needed to calculate gravitational potential and questioning how to set up the integral in relation to the position along the Earth's surface. There is also consideration of defining the area affected by the meteorite as an equipotential surface.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants offering insights into the geometry of the problem and the implications of using Gauss' Law. There is an exploration of how to define the integral and the potential above the meteorite, but no consensus has been reached on the specific setup or bounds.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the assumption that the meteorite is undeformed and that the displaced Earth magically vanishes, which may influence their reasoning about the gravitational potential and the setup of the problem.

21boy
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A meteorite impacts a flat-tabular Earth (with a density of 6gm/cm^3). During transit, the meteorite is observed to have a density of 8 gm/cm^3 and to be a perfect sphere of radius 1km. The meteorite penetrates the flat Earth to an unknown depth to center mass, z_0; z_0 > 1km. The meteorite is undeformed during emplacement and the Earth that is displaced magically vanishes and the hole above the meteorite is filled again so that the surface is flat and the density uniform everywhere except for the meteorite. Use relevant equations relating Gauss' Law to this geometry to derive the gravitational potential of the meteorite as a function of position along the Earth's (slab's) surface. Let x=0 be over the center of the mass of the meteorite.

*Positive z is pointing towards the Earth's surface
*z=0 at the surface of the slab
*The thickness of the Earth is t


Homework Equations


Δρ=ρ1-ρ => 8-6=2

g_z = 2.79E-10 (Δρ r_sphere h)/(3 (x^2+h^2)^(3/2) To find gravity in g_z direction

V= ∫g_z d? to find potential of gravity.

Question is I'm not sure of my bounds for the integral and what I should be integrating in respect to. Also, for calculating gravity, should I use x=0?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Question is I'm not sure of my bounds for the integral and what I should be integrating in respect to. Also, for calculating gravity, should I use x=0?
The answer depends on how you are using them - what is your reasoning?
 
Well I'm trying to calculate gravitational potential over the x-surface above a buried object. I would think that I would derive my integral in terms of dx from x=0(area directly above meteorite) to some positive value and do the same for a symmetric negative value. I'd define this area as my equipotential surface that's being affected by the meteorite.

Does that answer the problem statement?
 
OK - so the x-y plane is the surface, the com of the meteorite is at ##(x,y,z)=(0,0,-z_0)## ... The potential of the flat-Earth is ##gz:z\geq 0## but you want the potential of the meteorite.

You are asked to use Gausses Law - or "the relevant equations relating Gauss' Law to this geometry" - find the potential.

So what is the geometry in question?
What shape will the equipotential surfaces make in the plane?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
7K
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
7K