Gravitational potential energy, orbital speed, binding energy.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the gravitational potential energy, orbital speed, and binding energy of a satellite orbiting Earth. The gravitational potential energy was calculated to be approximately -1.03 x 10^11 J, while the orbital speed was determined to be around 7548.57 m/s. Participants debated the relationship between binding energy and kinetic energy, with clarification that binding energy represents the energy needed for the satellite to escape Earth's gravitational influence. The conversation emphasized the equivalence of gravitational and centripetal forces as a fundamental principle in understanding orbital mechanics. Overall, the calculations and theoretical concepts surrounding satellite dynamics were thoroughly examined.
Lolagoeslala
Messages
217
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


a satellite having a mass of 1800 kg orbits the Earth at a distance of 6.3 x 10^5 m above the surface find the gravitational potential energy of the satellite while in orbit, the orbital speed and the binding satellite.

The Attempt at a Solution



gravitational potential energy
Eg = -GMm/Ro
Eg = -(6.67x10^-11 Nm^2/kg^2)(5.98x10^24kg)(1800kg)/(6.37x10^6m)+(6.3x10^5m)
Eg = -1.03 x 10^11 J

the orbital speed

Ek = 1/2(GMm/Ro)
Ek = 0.5 x -1.03 x 10^11 J
Ek = 5.128277145 x 10^10 J

Ek = 1/2mv^2
V = 7548.57 m/s

binding satellite
Eb = 1/2(GMm/Ro)
Eb = 0.5 x -1.03 x 10^11 J
Eb = 5.128277145 x 10^10 J
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Lolagoeslala said:
the orbital speed
Ek = 1/2(GMm/Ro)
Whilst that is true, I would prefer to use the equivalence of the gravitational force and the centripetal force required to maintain the orbit. That seems to me to be a more fundamental principle.
binding satellite
Eb = 1/2(GMm/Ro)
I'm not sure about that. Does binding energy take into account the KE? Maybe it does.
 
haruspex said:
Whilst that is true, I would prefer to use the equivalence of the gravitational force and the centripetal force required to maintain the orbit. That seems to me to be a more fundamental principle.

I'm not sure about that. Does binding energy take into account the KE? Maybe it does.
You mean like this

m(v^2/Ro) = GMm/Ro^2 ?

Well binding energy is the energy required for the orbiting satellite to escape. So the total energy should be zero...

Well yes Ek is included...

Eg + Ek = Et1
- GMm/Ro + 1/2GMm/Ro = - 1/2 GMm/Ro

Et1 + Eb = Et2
- 1/2 GMm/Ro + Eb = 0 J
Eb = 1/2 GMm/Ro
 
Lolagoeslala said:
You mean like this

m(v^2/Ro) = GMm/Ro^2 ?
Yes.
Well binding energy is the energy required for the orbiting satellite to escape. So the total energy should be zero...

Well yes Ek is included...
OK.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top