Gravitational Potential Energy Problem

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the work done on a snowball by gravitational force and the changes in gravitational potential energy during its flight from a cliff. The initial calculations indicate that the work done (Wg) is approximately 57.15 J, and the change in gravitational potential energy is -57.15 J, suggesting a loss of energy as the snowball descends. However, there is confusion regarding the reference height for potential energy; it should be set at the top of the cliff rather than the ground. Consequently, the potential energy at the ground level should be negative, indicating a decrease from the reference point. Overall, the answers for parts a and b are confirmed, but part c requires clarification regarding the reference height.
VitaX
Messages
183
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A 0.720 kg snowball is fired from a cliff 8.10 m high. The snowball's initial velocity is 14.2 m/s, directed 30.0° above the horizontal. (a) How much work is done on the snowball by the gravitational force during its flight to the flat ground below the cliff? (b) What is the change in the gravitational potential energy of the snowball-Earth system during the flight? (c) If that gravitational potential energy is taken to be zero at the height of the cliff, what is its value when the snowball reaches the ground?

Homework Equations



Wg = mgyi - mgyf
Change in U = -W

The Attempt at a Solution



a) Wg = .720*9.8*8.10 = 57.1536 J
b) Change in U = -W = -57.1536 J
c) Ug = 0 J (I believe this is correct because since the initial Ug = 0 and the final height is 0, then the overall has to be 0 J)

I'm not sure about my answers because I didn't utilize the speed or angle they gave me that's one reason why I'm posting on here. I'm not sure if my formulas used are correct or incorrect.
My reference height used was at the bottom of the cliff. That equals zero.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Your answers to a and b look OK. For c, the ref height is the top of the 8.10 m cliff; thus at the top of the cliff, using the PE as zero at the cliff height, then at the bottom of the cliff, PE =?
 
i think your c) is wrong...
because the potential energy at the top of cliff is 0 so, at ground(just before hitting) it should be less than 0..

And i also think that there is no need to use the angle given...

EDIT: this is the second time phanthomjay and me gave answers at almost same time..:smile:
 
So part c) is

Wg = .720*9.8*0 -.720*9.8*8.1 = -57.1536 J

Is that what you are saying? If that's so then basically my answer for all parts is the same value just different signs?
 
basically, yes :smile:
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top