Gravitational Potential Energy of a projectile

AI Thread Summary
A projectile shot directly away from Earth's surface reaches a radial distance of 0.125 times Earth's radius when its initial speed is one-third of the escape speed. For a projectile with initial kinetic energy equal to two-fifths of the escape energy, the radial distance achieved is 0.670 times Earth's radius. The calculations involve using gravitational potential energy and kinetic energy equations, where mass cancels out. There is confusion regarding whether the height should be counted from the Earth's center, suggesting a potential adjustment to the final distances. The discussion highlights the importance of correctly interpreting the reference point for height in gravitational calculations.
lu6cifer
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
A projectile is shot directly away from Earth's surface. Neglect the rotation of Earth.

(a) As a multiple of Earth's radius RE, what is the radial distance a projectile reaches if its initial speed is one-third of the escape speed from Earth?

(b) As a multiple of Earth's radius RE, what is the radial distance a projectile reaches if its initial kinetic energy is two-fifths of the kinetic energy required to escape Earth





U = -GMm/r
K = 1/2mv^2
Radius of Earth = 6.38e6
Mass of Earth = 5.98e24




(a) Escape speed of Earth = 11.2 km/s
=11200 m/s

U1 + K1 = U2
-GMm/r + 1/2mv^2 = -GMm/(r+h)

m cancels out
11200/3 = 3733

(-6.67e-11 * 5.98e24) / 6.38e6 + 1/2 * 3733^2 = (-6.67e-11 * 5.98e24) / (6.38e6 + h)
-55550537.32 = -3.98866e14 / (6.38e6 + h)
h = 800236.5781

h / Re = 800236.5781 / 6.38e6 = 0.125 times the radius of the earth

(b)
U1 + K1 = U2
-GMm/r + 1/2mv^2 = -GMm/(r+h)

but it asks for 2/5 the KE, so

-GMm/r + (2/5)1/2mv^2 = -GMm/(r+h)
m cancels out

-GM/r + 1/5 v^2 = -GM / (r+h)
Plugged in the same numbers as part (a), except for v, which is 11200 m/s

I got h, divided by Radius of Earth (6.38e6) and get 0.670 times radius of earth


Did I make any mistakes? Because the answers are wrong, apparently
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, at least the eq looks right for me. The only thing I could think of, is that h is counted also from the center of earth. So instead of .125, h is 1.125?
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top