Gravitational potential of a thin ring

AI Thread Summary
To determine the gravitational potential of a thin ring with mass M and radius a, focus on the radial components of the gravitational force acting on a mass m placed within the plane of the ring. The law of cosines can be applied to calculate the gravitational influence from each element of the ring, considering symmetry cancels out forces perpendicular to the radius. An expansion around the equilibrium position is necessary to analyze stability, revealing whether small displacements lead to restoring or destabilizing forces. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding gravitational components in relation to the ring's geometry. Overall, the approach combines geometric considerations with gravitational principles to solve the problem effectively.
DerekDnl
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello, I am not sure how to set up this integral. Its a little more advanced than I am used too. Any ideas?


Consider a thin ring of radius a and mass M. A mass m is placed in the plane of the ring (not in the center!). Determine the gravitational potential for r < a. Find a position of equilibrium and determine whether it is stable or unstable. (Hint: Consider a small displacement from the equilibrium position and do an expansion.)


I think I have to use the law of cosines. But why would I need to do an expansion?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF.

Consider that wherever you are inside the ring you basically only need to be concerned about the component of the gravitational force that is in the radial direction. By symmetry anything normal to the radius will be canceled out left to right won't it?

So for any point a distance r away from the center all you need to do is develop an expression that describes, for each element about the ring the gravitational component that projects to the radius your mass is on.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top