Gravitational Potential Problem ( one simple yes/no question)

rockstar101
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



When finding the gravitational potential of a thick walled hollow cylinder from the

point P, located along the X-axis,

can I find the Gravitational potential of a solid cylinder and then subtract the
gravitational potential of a smaller (inner empty) cylinder?



Homework Equations



The Attempt at a Solution



This is my attempt to answer a much complicated problem.
I just need to make sure that I can subtract the two gravitational potential
to find the gp of hollow thick cylinder.

Any hint or help would be really appreciated thanks!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

Hi rockstar101! Welcome to PF! :wink:
rockstar101 said:
can I find the Gravitational potential of a solid cylinder and then subtract the
gravitational potential of a smaller (inner empty) cylinder?

I just need to make sure that I can subtract the two gravitational potential
to find the gp of hollow thick cylinder.

Yes … that's exactly the way to do it. :smile:
 
is the gravitational potential measuring from a point on Z axis same as the gp measured on a point on X axis?
 
(what happened to "one simple yes/no question"? :biggrin: :wink:)

If the Y-axis is the axis of the cylinder, yes. :smile:
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top