Gravitational potential using spherical harmonics (WGS84)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating Earth's gravitational potential using spherical harmonics based on the WGS84 model. The formula for gravitational potential, V, includes variables such as GM (Earth's gravitational constant), r (distance from the Earth's center), and a (semi-major axis of the WGS84 ellipsoid). A user, Ryan, seeks clarification on the definition of "d" in the context of derivatives used in the formula. Another participant clarifies that "d" refers to derivatives, which resolves Ryan's confusion. The exchange highlights the importance of understanding mathematical notation in gravitational potential calculations.
ryan88
Messages
41
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I am looking to use the definition from WGS84 to calculate Earth's gravitational potential using spherical harmonics, however I am having some difficulty finding the definition of one of the variables. Gravitational potential is given as the following:

V = \frac{GM}{r}\left [ 1 + \sum_{n=2}^{n_{max}} \sum_{m=0}^{n} \left( \frac{a}{r} \right )^n \bar{P}_{nm} \left( \sin{\phi} \right ) \left( \bar{C}_{nm} \cos{m\lambda} + \bar{S}_{nm} \sin{m\lambda} \right ) \right ]

where:

V is the gravitational potential function
GM is the Earth's gravitational constant
r is the distance from the Earth's centre of mass
a is the semi-major axis of the WGS84 ellipsoid
n,m are the degree and order respectively
\phi is the geocentric latitude
\lambda is the longitude
\bar{C}_{nm},\bar{S}_{nm} are normalised gravitational coefficients

\bar{P}_{nm}\left( \sin \phi \right) = \left[ \frac{(n-m)!(2n+1)k}{(n+m)!} \right] P_{nm}(\sin\phi)

P_{nm}(\sin\phi) = (\cos\phi)^m \frac{d^m}{d(\sin\phi)^m}[P_n(\sin\phi)]

P_n(\sin\phi) = \frac{1}{2^n n!} \frac{d^n}{d(\sin\phi)^n}\left( \sin^2\phi -1 \right )^n

m=0,k=1
m\ne0,k=2

However, I can't find what the definition of d is. Can anyone offer any help?

Thanks,

Ryan
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It means derivative. As in d/dt, d^2/dt^2, etc
 
Ah right, now I feel stupid, lol.

Thanks for that,

Ryan
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top