Gravitational pull of a black hole

AI Thread Summary
The gravitational pull of a black hole remains consistent due to its mass, which does not change. It is indeed possible for a planet to orbit a black hole, as evidenced by the discovery of exoplanets around pulsars like PSR B1257+12. The discussion emphasizes that the real question is whether planets can form in stellar systems that will eventually evolve into black holes. Since the mass required for a star to become a black hole is slightly higher than that of pulsars, it is likely that such stars could also host planetary systems. This suggests a potential for planets to exist in the vicinity of black holes.
Andrew Buren
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
Hi, doesn't the gravity of a black hole remain relatively the same? It should because gravitational attraction depends on mass, which stays the same. And if it does, is it posible for a planet to orbit the BH.? (without light, of course)
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Well the first exoplanet ever discovered orbited a pulsar:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PSR_B1257+12
PSR B1257+12 is a neutron star with a strong magnetic field that spins so rapidly that it “pulses”. The density of a neutron star is very close to being a black hole and if it accreted mass from a neighbor it would become a black hole. So, yes, a planet could orbit a black hole.
 
The question isn't really whether or not planets could orbit a BH, but rather, if they could form in a stellar system that will eventually contain a BH. The evidence of exoplanets around pulsars puts at least a lower bound on the stellar mass which will form planetary systems. Since the mass of a star that will form a black hole is just a tad bit higher, it seems likely that these stars could have planetary systems.
 
Thanks
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...

Similar threads

Back
Top