Gravitational Waves: Cosmic Inflation Equation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the gravitational wave equation during cosmic inflation, specifically questioning the validity of the Friedmann-Robertson-Walker (FRW) metric in this context. The correct equation governing tensor perturbations is identified as h'' + 2(a'/a)h' + k^2 h = 0, which is derived under the assumption of FRW expansion. Participants clarify that the FRW metric is applicable during inflation, as inflationary spacetimes are quasi-de Sitter, characterized by a scale factor a(t) proportional to exp(Ht). There is a distinction made between de Sitter space and Minkowski space, emphasizing that de Sitter has non-zero curvature while Minkowski does not. The conversation highlights the complexities of metric descriptions in different coordinate systems during inflation.
pleasehelpmeno
Messages
154
Reaction score
0
Hi not sure if this is GR or cosmology,
does anyone know what the gravitational wave equation is for GW's produced during cosmic inflation is it just \ddot{h}+2H\dot{h} +k^{2}h=0 because this is derivable using the FRW metric which isn't valid during inflastion, does this govern the dynamics as the waves re-enter the horizon?
 
Space news on Phys.org
The equation governing the evolution of tensor perturbations (gravitational waves) generated during inflation is
h'' + 2\frac{a'}{a}h' + k^2 h = 0
where the primes denote derivatives wrt conformal time, d\tau = dt/a (note that a'/a is not the Hubble parameter, which is defined this way in terms of coordinate time: H = \dot{a}/a.)

I'm not clear on your claim about the FRW metric not being valid during inflation -- what do you mean by this? The above EOM is derived assuming FRW expansion, and it is valid at all length scales (including after the mode re-enters the horizon).
 
It is also unclear to me why you say
pleasehelpmeno said:
the FRW metric which isn't valid during inflation
 
well surely inflation is quasi de sitter, so the metric is dt^2-d\underline{X}^2, whereas after infltaion in is FRLW sodt^2-a^{2}d\underline{X}^2.

Isn't that tensor perturbation eqn derived from the action S^{(2)}=\frac{a^{2}(t)}{2}d^{4}x which surely can't occur during inflation.
 
de Sitter is a vacuum FRLW spacetime.
 
Yeah but it doesn't have the scale factor so why in here for example does it derive that equation using an action that contains an a(t)?
 
pleasehelpmeno said:
Yeah but it doesn't have the scale factor so why in here for example does it derive that equation using an action that contains an a(t)?
The scale factor for de Sitter is a(t) \propto \exp(Ht). Why do you think there is no scale factor? (Keep in mind that while the full topological de Sitter space is static, inflationary spacetimes are described by only half of this space).
 
yeah but the metric describing de-sitter space is dt^2 - dx^2 isn't it?

Or during inflation is it dt^2 - a^2 dx^2 ?
 
The same spacetime can look very different in two different coordinate systems. I don't think that I am familiar with a coordinate system for which de Sitter looks like dt^2 - dx^2. Can you give a reference?
 
  • #10
pleasehelpmeno said:
yeah but the metric describing de-sitter space is dt^2 - dx^2 isn't it?

Or during inflation is it dt^2 - a^2 dx^2 ?
de Sitter space looks like ds^2 = dt^2 - \exp(2Ht)dx^2, with H = {\rm const}. It has the FRW form with a(t) = \exp(Ht), and is inflationary since H = {\rm const} \rightarrow \ddot{a}>0.
 
  • #12
pleasehelpmeno said:
Isn't it equivalent to minkowski space http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/De_Sitter_space

No!

Minkowski spacetime has zero spacetime curvature; de Sitter spacetime has non-zero spacetime curvature.

de Sitter spacetime can be considered to be a curved 4-dimensional hypersurface of a 5-dimensional space that has zero curvature.
 
Back
Top