Gravity Affects Light: Is What We See Real?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Karoka
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gravity Light
AI Thread Summary
Gravity does affect light, bending its path and altering our perception of reality, but this does not imply that what we see is fake. Light is interpreted by the brain, allowing us to perceive objects based on the light that reaches our eyes, which can be influenced by various factors like lenses and atmospheric conditions. While distant objects appear as they were in the past due to the finite speed of light, this does not negate their existence; it simply adds complexity to our perception. Gravitational lensing illustrates how massive objects can distort light, making it crucial for understanding the universe. Ultimately, our visual experience is a combination of physical phenomena and brain interpretation, making it both real and subject to various alterations.
Karoka
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
I heard that gravity can affect light (according to Einstein). So does it mean that all we can see is fake? We know that light comes to an eye in a straight line, but if gravity affects it, how can we be sure were seeing real things and not an illusion?
 
Science news on Phys.org
Gravity bends light, and light doesn't come to you in a straight line. My glasses also bend light. So do windows, and so does the atmosphere. Your eye also bends light. Do you look in a mirror in the morning?

What you are seeing is simply your brain's interpretation of a tiny silver of the spectrum of the outside world. It's just as "real" as a dream...but that's a philosophical discussion, not one for this site.
 
You are saying that something you see in a mirror or through a telescope is an illusion?

In a sense, you might claim that it is (an 'optical illusion') but the object you see is still real.
 
I think the point is that you can't see objects, you can only see the light coming from the object. Which is nice, cause it allows you to take pictures/movies and look at it later on ;)

On a side note, I wouldn't know how else it could work though :p
 
So does it mean that all we can see is fake?

It's not what I would call "fake" but very different than you might expect. Light is electromagnetic radiation, like that used in X rays for example, just a different frequency. And different observers may "see" things differently when moving relative to one another and at different observation locations.

Because light travels at a finite speed, distant cosmological objects, like stars, appear to us as they existed weeks or months or years ago...because the light takes that long to reach us. So a star you see right now may have exploded and the light reflecting that might not reach us for weeks or months. An analogy is fireworks explosions: you see the light after the detonation...but the sound takes a lot longer to reach you, so you hear the effects seconds later.

Also, as light passes a large mass gravity bends the light so an object is not exactly where it appears to be. That's called gravitational lensing.
 
Worth repeating:
Lsos said:
Gravity bends light, and light doesn't come to you in a straight line. My glasses also bend light. So do windows, and so does the atmosphere. Your eye also bends light.

This puts gravitational bending of light in perspective.

If light were not bent, you would not be able to see anything at all.

Gravitational bending is far, far down the list of ways that light is altered before it reaches your retinae.
 
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
I am currently undertaking a research internship where I am modelling the heating of silicon wafers with a 515 nm femtosecond laser. In order to increase the absorption of the laser into the oxide layer on top of the wafer it was suggested we use gold nanoparticles. I was tasked with modelling the optical properties of a 5nm gold nanoparticle, in particular the absorption cross section, using COMSOL Multiphysics. My model seems to be getting correct values for the absorption coefficient and...
Back
Top