Gravity and Acceleration on a 50,000 km Space Elevator

  • Thread starter Thread starter jack5000
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gravity Space
AI Thread Summary
A hypothetical 50,000 km space elevator would experience varying gravitational effects on passengers as they ascend, reaching weightlessness at approximately 35,800 km, where Earth's gravitational pull balances with the centrifugal force of the elevator's orbit. Beyond this point, gravity continues to exert influence, albeit weakly, as it never completely disappears. The maximum speed of the climber is limited by the thermal tolerance of its materials, with estimates suggesting speeds around 200 km/h for payload-carrying versions. The concept of a space elevator extending toward the moon is impractical due to the moon's longer orbital period, making it incompatible with the elevator's design. The upward acceleration of the elevator would create artificial gravity only if it is actively accelerating, not during constant velocity ascent.
jack5000
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I've been reading a lot about space elevators being built from carbon nanotube thread and having lifters powered by lasers. I'm imagining it to be 50,000 long. Obviously this is fiction at the moment, but i was wondering...

if there was such a structure, what would be the effects of gravity on someone in a lifter?
At what point would the effects be felt?
As the lifter was pushed/pulled further along the ribbon, how would gravity's force change along the journey.

Also what kind of speed do you think would be reached on a 50,000 km long cable?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
The passenger would weigh less and less, reaching weightlessness at the height of ~35800km(geosynchronous orbit), and then get heavier again, with the upper limit depending on the cable length.

The maximum speed of the climber would be constrained by the thermal tolerance of the climber/ribbon.
This publication:
http://www.mill-creek-systems.com/HighLift/contents.html
describes a climber going at 200km/h, but that is the cable-deployment vehicle, so perhaps the payload-carrying version could have a different, faster design.
 
Thanks the reply and for that publication, looks very interesting.

Bandersnatch said:
The passenger would weigh less and less, reaching weightlessness at the height of ~35800km(geosynchronous orbit), and then get heavier again, with the upper limit depending on the cable length.

Is the 35800km the point where Earths gravity has lost effect?

Also what if the ladder was going toward the moon? would the passenger feel the weight again as he got closer to the moon?

Would there be a Lagrangian point and would that effect?
 
jack5000 said:
Is the 35800km the point where Earths gravity has lost effect?
That point does not exist, the gravitational force from Earth is everywhere (but quite weak in large distances).
35800km is the point where the gravitational force is just enough to keep an object in an orbit with a period of 1 day (= the movement of the space elevator itself)

Also what if the ladder was going toward the moon? would the passenger feel the weight again as he got closer to the moon?
The moon needs much more time for an orbit, you cannot connect a space elevator to the moon (or extend it so far that the moon's gravity becomes important).

Lagrangian points refer to objects with the same orbital period - which would be about one month for moon, and not one day for the space elevator.
 
Doesn't the upward velocity of the elevator itself create an artificial gravity that has to be factored into these calculations?
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...

Similar threads

Back
Top