Gravity at an arbitrary location near a disc

  • Thread starter Thread starter bumpkin
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Disc Gravity
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating gravitational acceleration at an arbitrary location due to a disc with specified thickness, radius, and density. Participants suggest using symmetry and volume integrals to approach the problem, considering two cases: one for points outside the disc and another for points inside. It is noted that the gravitational field outside the disc behaves like that of a point mass at the center, while the field inside varies based on the position relative to the disc. The conversation also highlights the importance of using cylindrical coordinates for simplification. The overall consensus is that understanding the geometry of the problem is crucial for accurate calculations.
bumpkin
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



calculate the gravity acceleration at an arbitrary location due to a disc of thickness h, radius r and density p

Homework Equations



g=Gm/r^2

The Attempt at a Solution



define r in terms of the vector magnitude from the measurement point to some point on the disc, then hit it with a volume integral? Is there an easier way, say using symmetry?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
bumpkin said:

Homework Statement



calculate the gravity acceleration at an arbitrary location due to a disc of thickness h, radius r and density p

Homework Equations



g=Gm/r^2

The Attempt at a Solution



define r in terms of the vector magnitude from the measurement point to some point on the disc, then hit it with a volume integral? Is there an easier way, say using symmetry?
Welcome to Physics Forums.

I'm assuming that rho and h are constant.

It may well be easier to tackle this problem in two separate cases: (a) When the point of interest is outside the body; and (b) when the point of interest is inside the body. For the former case, the gravitational field of the disc is identical to that of a point source of equivalent mass, located at the centre of the disc.
 
Hootenanny said:
Welcome to Physics Forums.

I'm assuming that rho and h are constant.

It may well be easier to tackle this problem in two separate cases: (a) When the point of interest is outside the body; and (b) when the point of interest is inside the body. For the former case, the gravitational field of the disc is identical to that of a point source of equivalent mass, located at the centre of the disc.

rho and h are constant. I hadn't even thought of b. But for a, I would assume the acceleration at the edge of the disc would be different to the gravity long the axis of the disc? Ie if the disc was in the xy plane, the gravity at (r,0,h) would be different to (0,0,sqrt(r^2+h^2))?
 
Hootenanny said:
For the former case, the gravitational field of the disc is identical to that of a point source of equivalent mass, located at the centre of the disc.
That would be true for a uniform sphere, but not for a disk.
 
bumpkin said:
rho and h are constant. I hadn't even thought of b. But for a, I would assume the acceleration at the edge of the disc would be different to the gravity long the axis of the disc? Ie if the disc was in the xy plane, the gravity at (r,0,h) would be different to (0,0,sqrt(r^2+h^2))?
Oh, sorry. I assumed that you were working in 2D, in the plane of the disc. My bad.

The best option then is to transform into cylindrical coordinates. Apologies for the confusion.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top