[Gravity in general relativity] I dont understand this help

thetexan
Messages
269
Reaction score
13
Please view the following...

http://www.wimp.com/visualizegravity/

This is the way scientists try to explain the warping of space to explain gravity effects between to objects.

The very demonstration requires gravity to work! Why does one object track along the displaced track to begin with? Because gravity is drawing it downhill into the dimple. The dimple does cause a curved track but something else is causing the object to move within the influence of the dimple...gravity.

Let's say we place two Earth sized planets in space at, say, 300000 km apart. No movement relative to each other. Space time is distorted but so what. What causes one object to begin to be moved thru the curved distortion?

I can visualize how the 'track' of an already moving object will be curved by distortions as it travels. But I don't understand what would cause a 'relatively' unmoving object to 'want' to begin to move toward another?

With the video, Earth's gravity is pulling down on the balls causing them to accelerate downward into the fabric depression caused by the other object. In other words, gravity itself is necessary to explain gravity. This kind of visualization only makes me more confused.

Perhaps someone can help.

tex
 
Physics news on Phys.org
thetexan said:
What causes one object to begin to be moved thru the curved distortion?
You have to include the time dimension to describe that:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DdC0QN6f3G4

thetexan said:
This kind of visualization only makes me more confused.
Yes, it's a very bad way to explain General Relativity.
 
Last edited:
thetexan said:
I can visualize how the 'track' of an already moving object will be curved by distortions as it travels. But I don't understand what would cause a 'relatively' unmoving object to 'want' to begin to move toward another?

Gravity warps space-time, not just space. You're always moving through space-time even when you're at rest because you're going to the future which means that you folow a line in space-time even when you're at rest that line is called the world-line. The warping of space-time forces the object that was initially at rest to start falling towards the Earth because that's the way it's world-line goes through the warped space-time. You have to keep in mind that relativity is a four-dimensional geometric theory.
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Back
Top