Gravity & Photon Trajectory: Is Wavelength a Factor?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on whether the wavelength of photons affects their trajectory when passing near a massive object, specifically in the context of gravitational bending of light. Participants explore the implications of general relativity (GR) on this phenomenon, considering both theoretical and experimental perspectives.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question if photons of different wavelengths (900nm and 200nm) will be refracted at different angles when passing near a massive object.
  • It is argued that the term "refracted" is misleading in this context, as the bending of light by gravity is distinct from refraction in a medium.
  • One viewpoint suggests that all photons, regardless of energy, follow the same trajectory due to the geometry of spacetime, which is consistent for all objects.
  • Another participant emphasizes that the path of a photon is a geodesic, indicating that different energy photons will follow the same geodesic under identical initial conditions.
  • It is noted that gravitational lensing does not exhibit chromatic aberration, implying that deflection is independent of frequency or energy.
  • A potential exception is mentioned regarding scenarios with significant energy in the light pulse, where the total energy might influence the path, though this is considered atypical.
  • Experimental evidence is referenced, indicating that no differences in deflection have been found between signals of different frequencies, supporting the idea that wavelength does not affect gravitational bending.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that the bending of light by gravity does not depend on the wavelength of the photons. However, there are nuances regarding specific conditions and exceptions that remain unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Some limitations include the dependence on definitions of terms like "refracted" and the implications of GR being a classical theory, which may not fully account for quantum effects in certain scenarios.

chimera27
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
This seems like an intuitive question, but I've seen some rather contradictory answers on it and am not sure what to think. What I'm curious about is if two photons, A and B, with wavelengths 900nm and 200nm respectively, both start from the same point on the same trajectory passing near a massive object, will photon A be refracted at a larger angle than B? I would think yes, but I'm not sure, as I've seen both remarks that say the velocity (in this case 'c') alone is factored, and remarks that it would indeed affect it. Both answers raise interesting questions, and I'm not sure which better describes the situation. Any thoughts?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
chimera27 said:
will photon A be refracted at a larger angle than B?

You should not use the word "refracted" in this connection, because it invites the (incorrect) comparison with the refraction of light in a material medium that you are being tempted to make. Unfortunately there isn't a fancy word for the bending of light by gravity; it's usually just called "the bending of light by gravity".

There are at least two ways to understand why the answer to your question is "no"--i.e., why photons of different energies are bent the same by gravity. The first is by analogy with objects with nonzero rest mass; all such objects have their trajectories "bent" the same by gravity. If you shoot two rocks past the Earth, one more massive than the other, with the same initial positions and velocities, they will both follow identical trajectories. By analogy, the same should be true for two photons of different energies which are shot with the same initial positions and velocities (the velocities have to be the same in this case because they're both photons).

The second way is to recognize that, in GR, gravity is not a force; it's spacetime geometry. The "bending" of the paths of objects is a property of the geometry of spacetime, not a property of the objects. The geometry of spacetime is the same for all objects, photons included.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: chimera27
PeterDonis said:
The second way is to recognize that, in GR, gravity is not a force; it's spacetime geometry. The "bending" of the paths of objects is a property of the geometry of spacetime, not a property of the objects. The geometry of spacetime is the same for all objects, photons included.

To amplify on this for the OP, the track of a photon through spacetime is a geodesic, which in a curved space is the equivalent of a straight line. A geodesic is as straight as possible. (The equivalent on a sphere would be an arc of a great circle.) Two photons with different energies and otherwise identical initial conditions will both go "straight," i.e., both will follow the same geodesic.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71
Basically, the answer is no - the light will travel the same path (called a null geodesic) regardless of energy or frequency. Energy and frequency are related by quantum theory by the relation ##E = h \nu##, E being energy and ##\nu## being frequency. Technically, "photons" are outside the scope of GR, but if one replace "photon" with "weak light pulse" one gets the answer above, that the deflection is independent of frequency. So gravitational lenses don't show any chromatic aberration, for instance.

The fine-print exception to the above is that if you had gravitationally significant amounts of energy in the light (atypical, and probably not what you had in mind when you asked about "photons"), the approximations used to get the above result would be invalid, and the path would depend on the total energy in the light pulse (though it wouldn't depend directly on the frequency even so, but it might depend on the total energy, which in quantum terms would be the number of photons multiplied by the energy per photon. But see the remarks about GR being a classical theory.)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71
PeterDonis said:
You should not use the word "refracted" in this connection, because it invites the (incorrect) comparison with the refraction of light in a material medium that you are being tempted to make. Unfortunately there isn't a fancy word for the bending of light by gravity; it's usually just called "the bending of light by gravity".

There are at least two ways to understand why the answer to your question is "no"--i.e., why photons of different energies are bent the same by gravity. The first is by analogy with objects with nonzero rest mass; all such objects have their trajectories "bent" the same by gravity. If you shoot two rocks past the Earth, one more massive than the other, with the same initial positions and velocities, they will both follow identical trajectories. By analogy, the same should be true for two photons of different energies which are shot with the same initial positions and velocities (the velocities have to be the same in this case because they're both photons).

The second way is to recognize that, in GR, gravity is not a force; it's spacetime geometry. The "bending" of the paths of objects is a property of the geometry of spacetime, not a property of the objects. The geometry of spacetime is the same for all objects, photons included.
Thanks, that's what I thought. just wanted to confirm since I had heard a few contrary remarks when researching it. Also, my use of 'refracted' was simply keeping in terms of the gravitational 'lensing' analogy, and was purely a semantical error, not a genuine misunderstanding xD
 
IIRC this has also been tested experimentally by comparing the deflection of radio and/or light signals with different frequencies by the sun. No differences (dispersion) has been found.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
587
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 178 ·
6
Replies
178
Views
10K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K