Gravity Problems: Equilateral Triangle and Mile-High Building

  • Thread starter Thread starter Reti
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gravity
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around two physics problems involving gravitational forces. In the first problem, participants confirm that the gravitational force exerted by object M on the central object is equal to that of m, leading to the conclusion that M = m. The second problem involves calculating the change in weight when moving to the top of a hypothetical mile-high building, with one participant initially calculating a weight change of -0.231 N, which was later deemed incorrect. The correct approach involves using gravitational equations to relate weight at different heights, emphasizing the importance of understanding gravitational acceleration changes. Overall, the thread highlights the challenges in solving these gravitational problems and the need for accurate calculations.
Reti
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


3 single-point objects (M, m and m) forms an equilateral tri-angle with a 4th object in the middle. The sum of the gravitational force on the central object is 0. Represent the force of M in terms of m.



Problem 2: In 1956, Frank Lloyd Wright proposed the construction of a mile-high building in Chicago. Suppose the building had been constructed. Ignoring Earth's rotation, find the change in your weight if you were to ride an elevator from the street level, where you weigh 488 N, to the top of the building.




Homework Equations



F = G*(Mm/r^2)
= ma(gravity)
a(gravity) = GM/r^2

The Attempt at a Solution



1. answer says M = m, and yes, it does make sense, but can someone show me

2. my answer was -0.231N, but Wileyplus says it's wrong.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How did you do them? (For what it's worth, I agree with M=m and also can confirm that -.231N is wrong)
 
1. i do not know how to do it

2. since ma(g) = 488 N, you can find m by dividing 488 by 9.8.
Then you will realize that the ratio of r = ratio of a(g)
so therefore :

r+1600/r = 9.83/x

x being the new a(g).

then 488 - mx = -.231
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top