Gravity transition directly at the underside of a "shell planet"

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the gravitational effects experienced by a test mass within a "shell planet," as derived from Einstein's General Theory of Relativity. It is established that a test mass on the surface of a shell would experience the full gravitational acceleration of 9.8 m/s², while descending through a shell of finite thickness would result in a continuous decrease in gravitational pull until reaching zero gravity inside the shell. The transition from the curved Schwarzschild metric outside the shell to the flat Minkowski metric inside is also clarified, emphasizing the idealized nature of a zero-thickness shell.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Einstein's General Theory of Relativity
  • Familiarity with Gauss' Theorem in gravitational contexts
  • Knowledge of the Schwarzschild and Minkowski metrics
  • Basic concepts of gravitational acceleration and mass density
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of Gauss' Theorem in gravitational fields
  • Explore the Schwarzschild metric and its applications in astrophysics
  • Investigate the concept of gravitational fields within different geometries
  • Learn about the effects of shell thickness on gravitational pull
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, educators in relativity, and anyone interested in gravitational theory and its implications in cosmology.

mgkii
Messages
140
Reaction score
42
TL;DR
Does gravitational pull transition immediately from g to zero underneath the shell of a "shell planet"
I'm watching the Stanford University Lecture series: Einstein's General Theory of Relativity presented by Leonard Susskind (who incidentally has to be one of the greatest educators I've ever watched).

Whilst deriving the basic divergence equations relating acceleration, mass density, and Newton's gravitational constant, he took a small diversion to show that Gauss' Therum shows you that if you place a test-mass inside a uniformly dense planet, then "little g" is only proportional to the mass inside the radius of the sphere you place the test mass on - i.e. the effect of all of the mass "above you" cancels out. So far so good!

He then went on to extrapolate that if the mass of a planet was concentrated entirely in a shell, then something inside the shell would effectively feel no gravity. However there was some debate with the class and the example ended in rather a lot of confusion!

Sorry for the long preamble - finally to my question! Did I take the correct understanding that someone standing on the surface of a "shell earth" (where all the mass of the Earth was concentrated in an arbitrarily thin shell at the surface) would feel the full 9.8m/s/s acceleration of Earth's gravity, but if you dug through that shell then you would transition immediately to a zero m/s/s gravity? This seems to be only outcome based on what I think I've understood, but it seems so alien I need to check my logical compass!

Thanks
Matt

PS - This is only Lecture 2 of 12... please go easy on me :-)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mgkii said:
Does gravitational pull transition immediately from g to zero underneath the shell of a "shell planet"

Only in the idealized case of a shell with zero thickness, which is not physically realistic.

In a realistic case of a shell with finite thickness, the "gravitational pull" continuously decreases from g to zero as you descend through the shell. Once you are inside the shell, yes, there would be zero gravity.

In the more usual technical language of relativity, the metric would continuously change as you descend through the shell, from the (curved) Schwarzschild metric for a mass ##M## (the total mass of the shell) outside to the (flat) Minkowski metric inside.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71
Thank you. That makes complete sense now. Happy for this thread to be closed!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
1K
  • · Replies 69 ·
3
Replies
69
Views
8K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
5K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K