I Gravity transition directly at the underside of a "shell planet"

mgkii
Messages
138
Reaction score
42
TL;DR Summary
Does gravitational pull transition immediately from g to zero underneath the shell of a "shell planet"
I'm watching the Stanford University Lecture series: Einsten's General Theory of Relativity presented by Leonard Susskind (who incidentally has to be one of the greatest educators I've ever watched).

Whilst deriving the basic divergence equations relating acceleration, mass density, and Newton's gravitational constant, he took a small diversion to show that Gauss' Therum shows you that if you place a test-mass inside a uniformly dense planet, then "little g" is only proportional to the mass inside the radius of the sphere you place the test mass on - i.e. the effect of all of the mass "above you" cancels out. So far so good!

He then went on to extrapolate that if the mass of a planet was concentrated entirely in a shell, then something inside the shell would effectively feel no gravity. However there was some debate with the class and the example ended in rather a lot of confusion!

Sorry for the long preamble - finally to my question! Did I take the correct understanding that someone standing on the surface of a "shell earth" (where all the mass of the Earth was concentrated in an arbitrarily thin shell at the surface) would feel the full 9.8m/s/s acceleration of Earth's gravity, but if you dug through that shell then you would transition immediately to a zero m/s/s gravity? This seems to be only outcome based on what I think I've understood, but it seems so alien I need to check my logical compass!

Thanks
Matt

PS - This is only Lecture 2 of 12... please go easy on me :-)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mgkii said:
Does gravitational pull transition immediately from g to zero underneath the shell of a "shell planet"

Only in the idealized case of a shell with zero thickness, which is not physically realistic.

In a realistic case of a shell with finite thickness, the "gravitational pull" continuously decreases from g to zero as you descend through the shell. Once you are inside the shell, yes, there would be zero gravity.

In the more usual technical language of relativity, the metric would continuously change as you descend through the shell, from the (curved) Schwarzschild metric for a mass ##M## (the total mass of the shell) outside to the (flat) Minkowski metric inside.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71
Thank you. That makes complete sense now. Happy for this thread to be closed!
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
From $$0 = \delta(g^{\alpha\mu}g_{\mu\nu}) = g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} + g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu}$$ we have $$g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} = -g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \,\, . $$ Multiply both sides by ##g_{\alpha\beta}## to get $$\delta g_{\beta\nu} = -g_{\alpha\beta} g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \qquad(*)$$ (This is Dirac's eq. (26.9) in "GTR".) On the other hand, the variation ##\delta g^{\alpha\mu} = \bar{g}^{\alpha\mu} - g^{\alpha\mu}## should be a tensor...

Similar threads

Replies
69
Views
7K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
18
Views
1K
Replies
36
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Back
Top