Gravity Turbine: Harnessing Power from Falling Mass

  • Thread starter Thread starter Danille
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gravity Turbine
AI Thread Summary
Harnessing energy from gravity alone is not feasible, as there is no "free energy" available from gravitational fields without an input source. Current methods, like water turbines, rely on the sun's energy to cycle water, which is essential for generating power. The discussion highlights the need for mass movement to capture energy, suggesting that falling objects could theoretically produce energy, but this would be minimal and not practical for large-scale energy production. The concept of using gravity to turn a wheel is likened to kinetic energy systems, which require additional energy inputs for effective operation. Ultimately, the consensus is that while gravity can influence motion, it cannot independently generate usable energy without external sources.
Danille
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
We can make energy from the force of water moving, to turn a turbine. Is there a way to eliminate the water, but to just use the pull that gravity exerts against all matter instead?
If you need to have mass moving in order to harness that power, is there a way to siphon off the energy that is expended when things fall to the ground, even if it only a tiny amount of energy and then mutiply that process to an expotential rate?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Danille said:
We can make energy from the force of water moving, to turn a turbine. Is there a way to eliminate the water, but to just use the pull that gravity exerts against all matter instead?
If you need to have mass moving in order to harness that power, is there a way to siphon off the energy that is expended when things fall to the ground, even if it only a tiny amount of energy and then mutiply that process to an expotential rate?

Welcome to the PF.

There is no "free energy". For a water turbine to work, you need the energy input of the sun to evaporate water to return it to the top of the reservior in the form of rain. Unfortunately, you cannot tap useful energy out of the gravitational field of the Earth alone.
 
I think you may find there is a difference in turning a simple "wheel" using kinetic enegry
where the weight of the water or whatever material you use offsets the wheel causing it to turn. A turbine does use the same basic concept but instead of using simple kinetic enegry, heat is generally applied to burn fuel, create steam or pressure and that force is used to turn the device at controlled or acellerated speeds for whatever purpose. Using gravity goes back to a kineticly driven device like a wheel which is offset by wheight causing it to turn.
 
I think it's easist first to watch a short vidio clip I find these videos very relaxing to watch .. I got to thinking is this being done in the most efficient way? The sand has to be suspended in the water to move it to the outlet ... The faster the water , the more turbulance and the sand stays suspended, so it seems to me the rule of thumb is the hose be aimed towards the outlet at all times .. Many times the workers hit the sand directly which will greatly reduce the water...
comparing a flat solar panel of area 2π r² and a hemisphere of the same area, the hemispherical solar panel would only occupy the area π r² of while the flat panel would occupy an entire 2π r² of land. wouldn't the hemispherical version have the same area of panel exposed to the sun, occupy less land space and can therefore increase the number of panels one land can have fitted? this would increase the power output proportionally as well. when I searched it up I wasn't satisfied with...

Similar threads

Back
Top