Gravity's effects on primordial plasma

  • Thread starter Thread starter Chaos' lil bro Order
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Effects Plasma
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around a paper on General Relativistic Magneto-hydrodynamic (GRMHD) turbulence, which is acknowledged as complex but potentially valuable for understanding primordial plasma. Participants express interest in the implications of the theory, with one user planning to incorporate it into a blog. The complexity of GRMHD turbulence is noted, but its exploration is deemed worthwhile. Overall, the conversation highlights the significance of GRMHD in astrophysical models. The topic emphasizes the intersection of gravity and plasma dynamics in theoretical physics.
Chaos' lil bro Order
Messages
682
Reaction score
2
This is a neat paper I found, its a quick read.


http://www.isso.uh.edu/publications/A2006/2006_043_garrison.htm
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Space news on Phys.org
"General Relativistic Magneto-hydrodynamic (GRMHD) turbulence " sounds a real headache to solve!

Garth
 
I'm looking for models for my blog.
I'll include that one.
jal
 
Garth said:
"General Relativistic Magneto-hydrodynamic (GRMHD) turbulence " sounds a real headache to solve!

Garth

Heh. Sure is a mouth full. Still I think his theory holds credence and is worth exploring.
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
Why was the Hubble constant assumed to be decreasing and slowing down (decelerating) the expansion rate of the Universe, while at the same time Dark Energy is presumably accelerating the expansion? And to thicken the plot. recent news from NASA indicates that the Hubble constant is now increasing. Can you clarify this enigma? Also., if the Hubble constant eventually decreases, why is there a lower limit to its value?

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Writing: Input Wanted Coagulating iceteroidal 'fines'
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Back
Top