- 5,628
- 1,777
Alias? Once you get past the "horse-drawn" computer/CIA premise (plus "Davinci Code" prophecy)...okay, I'm watching it with my wife. Still...
Great Movies and Series [Not Sci-Fi]
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
108 replies · 8K views
mcastillo356
Gold Member
- 666
- 365
The Russia House
- 8,252
- 2,666
The OA is fantasy, not Sci Fi.Jarvis323 said:
- 8,252
- 2,666
Crashing [British]
Like Fleabag, a favorite of mine, it was created and written by, and stars Phoebe Waller-Bridge.
It is rude and crude like Fleabag but I found it amusing.
Like Fleabag, a favorite of mine, it was created and written by, and stars Phoebe Waller-Bridge.
It is rude and crude like Fleabag but I found it amusing.
Jarvis323
- 1,247
- 988
Is this a theory about what really happened in the show?Ivan Seeking said:
DaveC426913
Gold Member
2025 Award
- 24,601
- 8,936
No. What makes it fantasy is that things happen and the 'how' is irrelevant.Jarvis323 said:
Regardless of how things might have "really" happened, the show doesn't know or care. Thus, fantasy.
DaveC426913
Gold Member
2025 Award
- 24,601
- 8,936
I'm not sure. It doesn't have to have a lot of science to be sci fi, but the OA had none. There was literally no attempt at an explanation at all about how they were doing what they were doing. Like a magic potion or magic pill in plays of yore.Jarvis323 said:
Jarvis323
- 1,247
- 988
What about the part where she was being held by a mad scientist who was doing human experiments on near death experiences?DaveC426913 said:
My interpretation is that she was a lab rat for the experiments, but the acts of magic were open to interpretation, either delusion or real. There was never any demonstration of those magical powers outside the stories she told.
DaveC426913
Gold Member
2025 Award
- 24,601
- 8,936
It's not to say it doesn't have science in it. But the central premise - the conceit of the story - is a deliberate hand waving mystery.
DaveC426913
Gold Member
2025 Award
- 24,601
- 8,936
No science in the central premise - the conceit of the story.
What actual science is there in a mad scientist trying to drown people? That's really about character development than story premise.
How DID they keep coming back to life after being drowned? No science there. Just accept it and move on.
What actual science is there in a mad scientist trying to drown people? That's really about character development than story premise.
How DID they keep coming back to life after being drowned? No science there. Just accept it and move on.
Jarvis323
- 1,247
- 988
I don't know, it's labeled as sci fi by its distributors and elsewhere. Most of what is labeled as sci fi now days is not centrally premised on real science.DaveC426913 said:
DaveC426913
Gold Member
2025 Award
- 24,601
- 8,936
It doesn't have to be real science to be sci fi. Star Trek is sci fi because advanced tech based on fictional science is critical to the premise.Jarvis323 said:
No such science - real or fictional - is required for the premise of The OA. Magic or occultism or deism are perfectly plausible vehicles, and are defined by NOT being under the purview of scientific rationality. And that's OK - in fantasy.
Jarvis323
- 1,247
- 988
I think it would be a pretty different show if half of it wasn't about a scientist with advanced tech that is able to monitor near death experiences trying to prove the afterlife.DaveC426913 said:
- 8,252
- 2,666
She was an angel - the Original Angel.Jarvis323 said:
It doesn't get more mystical than that.
Your point is taken. It did have that sci-fi side to it. But ultimately the events were mystical and without explanation. And with her and her guide both being angels, it is hard to deny the mysticism.
Last edited:
- 8,252
- 2,666
Jarvis323 said:
One way to contrast the idea [sci vs fantasy] is to watch what I consider to be the best hard sci-fi movie ever made - PrimerIvan Seeking said:
If you watch Primer a number of times and think very hard about the plot, it can all be reverse engineered. But this is not true with The OA. The mystical events are unpredictable even retrospectively.
- 3,446
- 3,675
I sort of have to agree with @Ivan Seeking insofar as the ambiguous nature of what was actually discovered in the OA.Jarvis323 said:
Yes, it's true whatever was discovered was done so by a scientist with advanced tech, monitoring near death experiences, trying to prove the afterlife. But as the series progresses, the scientist's hypothesis is proven wrong. Whatever was discovered was not the afterlife -- at least not an afterlife of a traditionally believed nature. It was something else. Something different. What exactly it is isn't clear.
So yeah, there's science in the show. But the "science" part is debunked, at least a little, as part of the plot. So is that still science fiction? Maybe, but not necessarily certainly.
It would seem that what was actually discovered was some sort of proof of an Everttian interpretation of quantum mechanics (QM). But was it? The show could have done some hand-waving along those lines bringing it solidly back into the realm of science fiction. But they didn't actually do any invocation of QM. Well, not yet anyway.
So I guess we'll see, if there's another season.
- 8,252
- 2,666
I loved 95% of it! It is one of my favorite series by far. But they started losing me at the end. The robots were stupid. But I guess that is just because they violated my interpretation that it has to be a person for the mystical stuff to work. LOL!
My god machines will even replace us in the afterlife!
My god machines will even replace us in the afterlife!
- 8,252
- 2,666
Have we mentioned Young Sheldon? I like that show! 
- 8,252
- 2,666
Not to be forgotten...
SYNOPSIS: “Mindwalk,” like “My Dinner with Andre,” is a dialogue-driven film, which explores basic philosophical questions. In this case, the principal subject is holistic vs. atomistic ways of viewing the world. The film was directed by Austiran-born Bernt Capra, a Hollywood production designer. He also wrote the story behind the film, which he adapted from the popular book The Turning Point (1983) by his brother Fritjof Capra, noted physicist and environmentalist...
http://www.philfilms.utm.edu/1/mindwalk.htm
SYNOPSIS: “Mindwalk,” like “My Dinner with Andre,” is a dialogue-driven film, which explores basic philosophical questions. In this case, the principal subject is holistic vs. atomistic ways of viewing the world. The film was directed by Austiran-born Bernt Capra, a Hollywood production designer. He also wrote the story behind the film, which he adapted from the popular book The Turning Point (1983) by his brother Fritjof Capra, noted physicist and environmentalist...
http://www.philfilms.utm.edu/1/mindwalk.htm