Green function in electrostatics

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the application and understanding of Green's functions in electrostatics, particularly in the context of solving Dirichlet problems. Participants explore the mathematical formulation of Green's functions and seek physical intuition behind specific terms in the equations, especially the surface integral involving the derivative of the Green's function.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents the formula for the potential using Green's functions and questions the physical meaning of the surface integral involving the derivative of the Green's function.
  • Another participant explains the derivation of the Green's function using Gauss's theorem and how it relates to the boundary conditions of the Dirichlet problem.
  • A different participant expresses understanding of the mathematical derivation but seeks clarity on the physical intuition behind the surface integral's dependence on the derivative of the Green's function.
  • One participant describes the Green's function as representing the potential due to a point charge and discusses the role of surface charge distribution in fulfilling boundary conditions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the mathematical formulation and derivation of Green's functions but express differing levels of understanding regarding the physical interpretation of specific terms, particularly the surface integral involving the derivative of the Green's function. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the physical intuition behind these concepts.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the dependence on boundary conditions and the specific geometry of the problem when discussing Green's functions. There is an emphasis on the need for physical intuition that may not be fully articulated in the mathematical expressions.

Lior Fa
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hello,
I'm taking a course in electrostatics and electrodynamics.

We learned about finding a potentional using unique Green functions that are dependent of the geometry of the problem. Specificly on a Dirichlet problem we get the solution:

Φ(x)=∫ρ(x')G(x,x')d3x' - (1/4π)*∫Φ(x')*(∂G(x,x')/∂n')da'


I understand the idea of the Green function, but don't understand why on the second integral (surface integral) there is a use of the partial deriviative of G. Can anyone give me some intuition about it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The idea of the Green's function is based on Green's integral theorem, which is an application of Gauss's theorem,
$$\int_{V} \mathrm{d}^3 \vec{x}' \vec{\nabla}' \cdot \vec{A}(\vec{x}')=\int_{\partial V} \mathrm{d}^2 \vec{f} \cdot \vec{A}(\vec{x}'),$$
where ##V## is some volume and ##\partial V## its boundary surface. The orientation of the surface-normal vectors is out of the volume.

Now set
$$\vec{A}(\vec{x}')=G(\vec{x},\vec{x}') \vec{\nabla}' \Phi(\vec{x}')-\Phi(\vec{x}')\vec{\nabla}' G(\vec{x},\vec{x}')$$
Then
$$\vec{\nabla}' \cdot \vec{A}(\vec{x}')=G(\vec{x},\vec{x}') \Delta' \Phi(\vec{x}') - \Phi(\vec{x}') \Delta' G(\vec{x},\vec{x}').$$
If the Green's function now satisfies
$$\Delta' G(\vec{x},\vec{x}')=-4 \pi \delta^{(3)}(\vec{x}-\vec{x}')$$
and if ##\Phi## fulfills (Gauss units)
$$\Delta' \Phi(\vec{x}')=-4 \pi \rho(\vec{x}')$$
you have
$$\vec{\nabla}' \cdot \vec{A}(\vec{x}')=-4 \pi G(\vec{x},\vec{x}') \rho(\vec{x}') + 4 \pi \Phi(\vec{x}') \delta^{(3)}(\vec{x},\vec{x}').$$
Now integrate this over the volume ##V##, you get for ##\vec{x} \in V##
$$\int_V \mathrm{d}^3 \vec{x}' \vec{\nabla}' \cdot \vec{A}(\vec{x}') = -4 \pi \int_V \mathrm{d}^3 \vec{x}' G(\vec{x},\vec{x}') \rho(\vec{x}')+4 \pi \Phi(\vec{x}).$$
According to Gauss's Law, this equals the surface integral
$$-4 \pi \int_V \mathrm{d}^3 \vec{x}' G(\vec{x},\vec{x}') \rho(\vec{x}')+4 \pi \Phi(\vec{x})=\int_{\partial V} \mathrm{d}^2 \vec{f}' \cdot \vec{A}(\vec{x}') = \int_{\partial V} \mathrm{d}^2 \vec{f}' \cdot [G(\vec{x},\vec{x}') \vec{\nabla}' \Phi(\vec{x}')-\Phi(\vec{x}')\vec{\nabla}' G(\vec{x},\vec{x}')].$$
By definition the Dirichlet problem means that you know ##\Phi(\vec{x}')## for ##\vec{x}' \in \partial V## but nothing about derivatives of ##\Phi## along the surface. Thus you define the Green's function such that it has to fulfill the boundary condition
$$G(\vec{x},\vec{x}')|_{\vec{x}' \in \partial V}=0,$$
then you get
$$4 \pi \Phi(\vec{x})=4 \pi \int_V \mathrm{d}^3 \vec{x}' G(\vec{x},\vec{x}') \rho(\vec{x}')-\int_{\partial V} \mathrm{d}^2 \vec{f}' \cdot \Phi(\vec{x}') \vec{\nabla}' G(\vec{x},\vec{x}').$$
Since further ##\mathrm{d}^2 \vec{f}' =\vec{n} \mathrm{d}^2 a##, dividing by ##4 \pi## gives your formula.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: dextercioby
vanhees71
thank you for the explenation.
I understand the mathematics of it and how to derive it.
What I don't understand is the physical intuition behind the derivietive of G on the surface integral.
G on the volume integral means (as far as I understood) summing up the impulse response of 1 charge at x, for all the volume V, witch makes good sense.
But the surface integral says: sum up the (known) potential product with the deriviative of G in direction of the normal to S. What is the physical meaning of this?
 
The Green's function, seen as a field ##\Phi(\vec{x})=G(\vec{x},\vec{x}')## is the solution for the situation that you have a point charge of charge ##q=1## in ##\vec{x}'## and a grounded conducting surface ##\partial V##, because it's 0 along this surface. Physically the charges within the conducting surface rearrange due to the presence of the unit charge at ##\vec{x}'## such as to fulfill this boundary condition, and thus in addition to this unit charge you have a surface charge distribution along the surface, and this surface charge distribution is given by the normal component of the electric field along the surface, but the field is the gradient of ##G##, and the contribution of this surface charge thus makes the term with the surface integral in Green's formula.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: dextercioby

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
20K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K