Green function in electrostatics

In summary, the conversation discusses the use of Green's functions in solving potential problems in electrostatics and electrodynamics. The Green's function is based on Green's integral theorem and is used to find the solution for a point charge in the presence of a grounded conducting surface. The physical meaning of using the derivative of the Green's function in the surface integral is to account for the contribution of the surface charge distribution in addition to the unit charge.
  • #1
Lior Fa
4
0
Hello,
I'm taking a course in electrostatics and electrodynamics.

We learned about finding a potentional using unique Green functions that are dependent of the geometry of the problem. Specificly on a Dirichlet problem we get the solution:

Φ(x)=∫ρ(x')G(x,x')d3x' - (1/4π)*∫Φ(x')*(∂G(x,x')/∂n')da'


I understand the idea of the Green function, but don't understand why on the second integral (surface integral) there is a use of the partial deriviative of G. Can anyone give me some intuition about it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
The idea of the Green's function is based on Green's integral theorem, which is an application of Gauss's theorem,
$$\int_{V} \mathrm{d}^3 \vec{x}' \vec{\nabla}' \cdot \vec{A}(\vec{x}')=\int_{\partial V} \mathrm{d}^2 \vec{f} \cdot \vec{A}(\vec{x}'),$$
where ##V## is some volume and ##\partial V## its boundary surface. The orientation of the surface-normal vectors is out of the volume.

Now set
$$\vec{A}(\vec{x}')=G(\vec{x},\vec{x}') \vec{\nabla}' \Phi(\vec{x}')-\Phi(\vec{x}')\vec{\nabla}' G(\vec{x},\vec{x}')$$
Then
$$\vec{\nabla}' \cdot \vec{A}(\vec{x}')=G(\vec{x},\vec{x}') \Delta' \Phi(\vec{x}') - \Phi(\vec{x}') \Delta' G(\vec{x},\vec{x}').$$
If the Green's function now satisfies
$$\Delta' G(\vec{x},\vec{x}')=-4 \pi \delta^{(3)}(\vec{x}-\vec{x}')$$
and if ##\Phi## fulfills (Gauss units)
$$\Delta' \Phi(\vec{x}')=-4 \pi \rho(\vec{x}')$$
you have
$$\vec{\nabla}' \cdot \vec{A}(\vec{x}')=-4 \pi G(\vec{x},\vec{x}') \rho(\vec{x}') + 4 \pi \Phi(\vec{x}') \delta^{(3)}(\vec{x},\vec{x}').$$
Now integrate this over the volume ##V##, you get for ##\vec{x} \in V##
$$\int_V \mathrm{d}^3 \vec{x}' \vec{\nabla}' \cdot \vec{A}(\vec{x}') = -4 \pi \int_V \mathrm{d}^3 \vec{x}' G(\vec{x},\vec{x}') \rho(\vec{x}')+4 \pi \Phi(\vec{x}).$$
According to Gauss's Law, this equals the surface integral
$$-4 \pi \int_V \mathrm{d}^3 \vec{x}' G(\vec{x},\vec{x}') \rho(\vec{x}')+4 \pi \Phi(\vec{x})=\int_{\partial V} \mathrm{d}^2 \vec{f}' \cdot \vec{A}(\vec{x}') = \int_{\partial V} \mathrm{d}^2 \vec{f}' \cdot [G(\vec{x},\vec{x}') \vec{\nabla}' \Phi(\vec{x}')-\Phi(\vec{x}')\vec{\nabla}' G(\vec{x},\vec{x}')].$$
By definition the Dirichlet problem means that you know ##\Phi(\vec{x}')## for ##\vec{x}' \in \partial V## but nothing about derivatives of ##\Phi## along the surface. Thus you define the Green's function such that it has to fulfill the boundary condition
$$G(\vec{x},\vec{x}')|_{\vec{x}' \in \partial V}=0,$$
then you get
$$4 \pi \Phi(\vec{x})=4 \pi \int_V \mathrm{d}^3 \vec{x}' G(\vec{x},\vec{x}') \rho(\vec{x}')-\int_{\partial V} \mathrm{d}^2 \vec{f}' \cdot \Phi(\vec{x}') \vec{\nabla}' G(\vec{x},\vec{x}').$$
Since further ##\mathrm{d}^2 \vec{f}' =\vec{n} \mathrm{d}^2 a##, dividing by ##4 \pi## gives your formula.
 
  • Like
Likes dextercioby
  • #3
vanhees71
thank you for the explenation.
I understand the mathematics of it and how to derive it.
What I don't understand is the physical intuition behind the derivietive of G on the surface integral.
G on the volume integral means (as far as I understood) summing up the impulse response of 1 charge at x, for all the volume V, witch makes good sense.
But the surface integral says: sum up the (known) potential product with the deriviative of G in direction of the normal to S. What is the physical meaning of this?
 
  • #4
The Green's function, seen as a field ##\Phi(\vec{x})=G(\vec{x},\vec{x}')## is the solution for the situation that you have a point charge of charge ##q=1## in ##\vec{x}'## and a grounded conducting surface ##\partial V##, because it's 0 along this surface. Physically the charges within the conducting surface rearrange due to the presence of the unit charge at ##\vec{x}'## such as to fulfill this boundary condition, and thus in addition to this unit charge you have a surface charge distribution along the surface, and this surface charge distribution is given by the normal component of the electric field along the surface, but the field is the gradient of ##G##, and the contribution of this surface charge thus makes the term with the surface integral in Green's formula.
 
  • Like
Likes dextercioby

1. What is a Green function in electrostatics?

A Green function in electrostatics is a mathematical function that helps to solve the Poisson's equation, which describes the electric potential in a region of space. It represents the solution to the equation for a specific point in space, given the boundary conditions of the system.

2. How is a Green function used in electrostatics?

A Green function is used to solve the Poisson's equation by converting it into an integral equation, which can then be solved numerically or analytically. The Green function acts as a kind of "mapping" between the boundary conditions and the solution at a specific point in space.

3. What are the properties of a Green function in electrostatics?

A Green function in electrostatics must satisfy certain properties, such as being symmetric, continuous, and differentiable. It must also satisfy the boundary conditions of the system and approach zero as the distance from the point of interest approaches infinity.

4. How is a Green function related to the concept of electrostatic potential?

The Green function is directly related to the electrostatic potential in a region of space. It represents the potential at a specific point in space due to a unit charge at a different point. By using the Green function, the potential at any point in the system can be calculated.

5. Can a Green function be used for systems with complex geometries?

Yes, a Green function can be used for systems with complex geometries. In such cases, the Green function can be expressed as a series of simpler Green functions for simpler geometries, which can then be combined to find the solution for the complex system.

Similar threads

  • Electromagnetism
Replies
18
Views
1K
  • Electromagnetism
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • Classical Physics
Replies
1
Views
138
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
276
Replies
3
Views
732
Replies
1
Views
845
Replies
4
Views
866
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
705
  • Differential Equations
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top