Green's Relations and Their Congruences

  • Thread starter Thread starter brydustin
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Relations
brydustin
Messages
201
Reaction score
0
I don't understand how a left (right) Green relation is a right (left) congruence.

xLy <=> Sx = Sy (Green's Left Relation): where we join 1 to S if it doesn't have identity.
Left Congruence: aPb ==> caPcb for some c in the semigroup S.

Take this example table:

* a|b|c
a|a|b|c
b|b|a|c
c|c|b|c

aS = {a,b,c} = bS, so aRb (Green's Right Relation).
But IF it were a left congruence then any element,x, of the Semigroup S, would satisfy the following equation:

aRb ==> xaRxb; then let x=c. Notice ca=c, cb=b, then:

caS = cS = {b,c} </> {a,b,c} = bS = cbS. Therefore there is not a Right Green Relation
(cRb does not exists because cS <> bS, therefore the Right Green relation isn't a left congruence).

Clearly, there is a flaw in my logic, but I don't know where.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
aLb iff Sa = Sb. Also acLbc iff Sac = Sbc. But if Sa=Sb then (Sa)c=(Sb)c trivially so. But this shows its a right congruence, by definition... Funny, no one answered this post, but me...
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top